2021
DOI: 10.1109/tem.2020.3006302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Standardization in a Digital and Global World: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned earlier, we assume the context of standardized ES provided by a software vendor as a boundary for our DPs with the goal of supporting an ML solution implementation by a mass market. This assumption is a reasonable one since ES is the de facto standard for enterprise software on the market and ML belongs to the class of enterprise application software used in companies [12]. Because the ML marketplace provides pre-trained ML models, they must be integrated into the corresponding ES of the marketplace participant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned earlier, we assume the context of standardized ES provided by a software vendor as a boundary for our DPs with the goal of supporting an ML solution implementation by a mass market. This assumption is a reasonable one since ES is the de facto standard for enterprise software on the market and ML belongs to the class of enterprise application software used in companies [12]. Because the ML marketplace provides pre-trained ML models, they must be integrated into the corresponding ES of the marketplace participant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, an ML marketplace is helpful in achieving faster market penetration of ML standards across companies. Achieving a de facto standard of ML usage would mean that a large number of companies use ML in a similar way [12]. Probably caused by the minimal standardization of ML in ES, the market penetration of ML in companies is low [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Layered system architectures and platforms [20] are considered to promote generativity and provide open interfaces for other organizations to contribute to the system. These types of system architectures are connected to platform-based approaches to do business amid a large network of actors in an organizational ecosystem [46], [48] stressing a possibility to achieve market control through standardization [49].…”
Section: B Cops and Digitalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While platform-based approaches were initially explored as internal or supply chain platforms [24] there is an increasing focus on platforms as a new way of organizing within a large network of actors in an organizational ecosystem [22]. It appears that the main rationale for platforms in IT and mobile technology is the ability to master the combination of market control and generativity [49] while for CoPS industries we find the rationale to be an ability to master the unique combination of system criticality and generativity.…”
Section: A Avenue 1: Generativity In Safety-critical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishing consensus among independent ecosystem participants, standards amplify e-commerce ecosystems by ensuring a proper value proposition (Adner, 2017 ; Papachristos & van de Kaa, 2021 ; Staudenmayer et al, 2005 ). Technical standards are defined as “the characteristics of a product as well as its level of performance, safety, or quality” (Viardot et al, 2021 , p. 11). Standards can be defined generally and within e-commerce ecosystems by standard-setting organizations or competitive market forces that most likely are the platform owners (de facto standard) or enforced by law (de jure standard).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%