2014
DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: The Future of Writing and Reviewing for IJMR

Abstract: In this editorial, the co-editors-in-chief undertake a number of tasks related to International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR). They begin by reviewing the objectives set out by Macpherson and Jones in their 2010 editorial (IJMR, 12, pp. 107-113). The benefits of publishing in IJMR for scholars at various stages of their careers are then discussed. The section outlining the progress of IJMR over the last four years sets out the main reasons why so many papers are desk rejected by the co-editors. The main… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
193
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(177 reference statements)
0
193
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Since digital search for articles has been introduced, literature reviews have turned to structured analytical reviews, where different review types contribute to knowledge development: evidence-based, meta-ethnography, meta-narrative, realist synthesis, and meta-analysis (see Jones & Gatrell, 2014). We would classify ours as a narrative review, based on informal mechanisms for organizing and analyzing the literature (Hammersley, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since digital search for articles has been introduced, literature reviews have turned to structured analytical reviews, where different review types contribute to knowledge development: evidence-based, meta-ethnography, meta-narrative, realist synthesis, and meta-analysis (see Jones & Gatrell, 2014). We would classify ours as a narrative review, based on informal mechanisms for organizing and analyzing the literature (Hammersley, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated in Figure 2, the initial keyword combination search yielded 10,589 outputs in the previous stage, which were further filtered in this and subsequent stages in a process that incorporates the exclusion criteria established by the research protocol (Jones and Gatrell 2014). As demonstrated in Figure 2, the initial keyword combination search yielded 10,589 outputs in the previous stage, which were further filtered in this and subsequent stages in a process that incorporates the exclusion criteria established by the research protocol (Jones and Gatrell 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample development followed standard procedures for literature reviews (Hoon, 2013;Jones & Gatrell, 2014;Tranfield et al, 2003). I first searched for the keywords 'disaster management', 'disaster response', 'emergency management' and 'emergency response' in the Google Scholar database (for a description of these key terms and their distinction from the related term 'crisis management' cf.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%