Edmodo-Based Science Module Development on Students’ Mastery of Science Process Skills: Need Analysis

Ahmad, Norhayati; Iksan, Zanaton H.

doi:10.4236/ce.2021.1211195

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The platform also allows for content development, course management and administration, learner tracking, and formative/summative assessment. Studies have shown that Edmodo-based instruction can lead to higher student achievements (Ahmad & Iksan, 2021; Sumarno, 2019) and positive perceptions of the platform, especially in language learning (Barrot, 2021; Sumarno, 2019). Digital devices, including Edmodo, have been found to have a positive impact on the learning process overall.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Electronic Portfolio-Based Writing Instruction on the Second Language Writing Performance and Writing Self-Efficacy of EFL Learners: A Mixed Methods Study

Guo,

2024

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research sought to examine the impact of electronic portfolio -based writing instruction on the second language writing performance and writing self-efficacy of Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. A total of 64 participants were divided into two groups, an experimental group ( n = 31) and a control group ( n = 33). The experimental group was given electronic portfolio-based instruction via Edmodo platform, while the control group received only traditional in-class writing instruction without the use of Edmodo. Two sample IELTS tasks and Writing Self-efficacy scale were administered to collect the quantitative data. Further, semi-structured interviews were carried out with participants in the experimental group to gather qualitative data on their perceptions and experiences with electronic portfolio-based writing instruction. The results of paired samples t-tests and ANCOVAs indicated that electronic portfolio-based writing instruction significantly improved global writing performance and its underlying components, namely content, organization, language use, vocabulary, and mechanics, as well as the writing self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Qualitative results revealed several themes, including increased motivation, improved feedback, enhanced collaboration, improved writing skills, and increased writing self-efficacy. Overall, the study demonstrates that electronic portfolio can be a valuable tool for EFL writing instruction and has a positive impact on writing performance and writing self-efficacy for Chinese EFL learners.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Electronic Portfolio-Based Writing Instruction on the Second Language Writing Performance and Writing Self-Efficacy of EFL Learners: A Mixed Methods Study

Guo,

2024

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Olowu's (2023) research explains that in improving science process skills, teachers can create science practicum activities, problem solving, inquiry, PjBL, and other direct scientific training are examples (Olowu, 2023). (Güder et al, 2022), gamification and game-based activities (Macayan et al, 2022), online modules that utilize ICT, internet and social media (Ahmad & Iksan, 2021), problem solving learning (Audu, 2022), and HANDLE project (Bibon, 2022) could enhance students' process skills.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Science Process Skills in Education: Bibliometric Analysis and Review

Elliyani,

Suryanti,

Supardi

et al. 2024

J. Prisma. Sains

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to view and review published research on Science Process Skills (SPS) in 2020–2023 using VOSViewer. Article data from Google Scholar database journals collected using Publish or Perish. In 2020-2021 the number of articles published experienced a significant increase, but starting from 2022-2023 it experienced a drastic decline. Topics such as science process skills, students, development, effects, models, analysis, and learning have often been discussed by researchers. In contrast to keywords such as correlation, STEM, self efficacy, case, comparison, improvement, argumentation, and POGIL, these are research topics that are rarely researched and too broad to be studied in more depth. The results of the review of the top 10 articles cited tend to examine strategies for mastering science process skills which include experimentation, minds-on, inquiry approaches, discovery learning, strategic manipulation, debate skills, ICT, STEM, student-centered teaching, use of a variety of learning tools, hands-on exercises, group activities, PhET, mobile scientific investigations, guided inquiry, PBL, PjBL, learning cycles, use of learning media, modules and worksheets. The novelty of this research is a bibliometric analysis and review of the latest research in the field of SPS. The implication of this research is contributes and support Kurikulum Merdeka’s science learning outcomes. Future researchers can use these insights to improve science education, helps focus on their studies, and pinpoint SPS research trends.

show abstract

A systematic literature review of education for Generation Alpha

Höfrová,

Balidemaj,

Small

2024

Discov Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Generation Alpha are the first to grow up immersed in digital technology and presumed to be wired differently than previous generations. This systematic review synthesizes the research literature on what has been learned so far and broadly answers the following question: What is happening in the education and training of Generation Alpha? The literature review was conducted based on guidelines outlined by The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Titles of 2,093 studies, abstracts of 603 studies, and 335 full-text studies were evaluated for inclusion criteria. A total of 83 studies were included into the literature review. The studies were sorted into four major categories: (1) the role of teachers, (2) the role of new approaches to education, (3) the role of teaching tools, and (4) the role of blended/online learning. Despite frequent use of the term “Generation Alpha” in the research literature, relatively few studies report generational differences that reveal how children of this generation are characteristically different from previous generations. There is simply a strong assumption that Generation Alpha is different. A major concern is that the use of technology by Generation Alpha has decreased opportunities for social-emotional development and increased mental health problems. There are digital educational tools and online strategies being developed and tested but none have emerged to be dominant.

show abstract

Edmodo-Based Science Module Development on Students’ Mastery of Science Process Skills: Need Analysis

Cited by 3 publications

References 32 publications

The Effect of Electronic Portfolio-Based Writing Instruction on the Second Language Writing Performance and Writing Self-Efficacy of EFL Learners: A Mixed Methods Study

The Effect of Electronic Portfolio-Based Writing Instruction on the Second Language Writing Performance and Writing Self-Efficacy of EFL Learners: A Mixed Methods Study

Science Process Skills in Education: Bibliometric Analysis and Review

A systematic literature review of education for Generation Alpha

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About