2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.860297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education and Quality of Life: Does the Internet Matter in China?

Abstract: The internet has influenced human wellbeing through social networking, time-saving, diffusion of knowledge, and access to health information. Health is a key component of human quality of life. This study examines the nexus between education, the internet, and quality of life using data from China spanning the period from 1991 to 2020. The study used ARDL to examine the short and long-term, exploring education and the impact of the internet on quality of life. Education status plays a significant role in promo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher-educated Afghan refugees had better quality of life scores in the social domain. Education improves life quality was also reported in China (109).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Higher-educated Afghan refugees had better quality of life scores in the social domain. Education improves life quality was also reported in China (109).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Improved quality of life has been evidenced by better education. [ 39 , 40 , 48 , 49 ] In addition, Article 45 states that the State will endeavor to provide free education till the age of 6 years for all Indian citizens. Article 24: No child below the age of 14 years shall be employed in for work.…”
Section: Policies Toward Child Well-being and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan mayoritas pasien Katarak Senilis yang mendapat terapi medikamentosa ataupun operasi memiliki latar belakang pendidikan S1 dan sederajat, dengan jumlah 13 orang (36,1 %). Sejalan dengan Zhan et al, 2022di China dan Jacob et al, 2021 Spanyol. Hasil penelitian ini tidak ditemukan perbedaan signifikan terkait jumlah responden lulusan S1 dan sederajat jika dibandingkan dengan responden lulusan SD, selisih jumlah responden ini hanya berjumlah 3 orang (8,3 %).…”
Section: Karakteristik Responden Penelitianunclassified