“…Although the literature already described the role played by individual attitudes (Makarova & Herzog, 2013;Caqueo et al, 2021), the involvement of the family (Lea, 2012) and the actions that the school may take in the education of migrant students (Faas, et al, 2015), the findings of this study indicate that educational institutions not only are aware of their strengths but also that these are fundamental to retain students. However, after highlighting the disposition of students, families and establishments, it is curious that educational institutions did not mention measures such as the Provisional School Identifier (in Spanish, IPE), which corresponds to a single number provided by the Ministry of Education of Chile that allows migrant students-with illegal status-to access the school system and have the same rights as national students (Summers et al, 2022). In other words, the discourse of the four studied schools emphasizes disposition, as the state and specifically the Ministry of Education would not provide the necessary, and mostly effective, support to protect migrant children and adolescents.…”