2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education does not protect against age-related decline of switching focal attention in working memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
15
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of differential decline in drift rates is consistent with work by Lindenberger and Baltes (1997), Rabbitt, Chetwynd, and McInnes (2003), and Singer et al (2003) who found little differential decline as a function of ability (but see Deary, MacLeannan, & Starr, 1998, who did find evidence for differential age-related declines as a function of ability). Our results are also consistent with research investigating the effects of education on age-related cognitive decline where decreases in cognitive abilities are as large for higly educated subjects as low educated subjects (Christensen et al, 2007; Tucker-Drob, Johnson, & Jones, 2009; Van Dijk, Van Gerven, Van Boxtel, Van der Elst, & Jolles, 2008; Van Gerven, Meijer, & Jolles, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This lack of differential decline in drift rates is consistent with work by Lindenberger and Baltes (1997), Rabbitt, Chetwynd, and McInnes (2003), and Singer et al (2003) who found little differential decline as a function of ability (but see Deary, MacLeannan, & Starr, 1998, who did find evidence for differential age-related declines as a function of ability). Our results are also consistent with research investigating the effects of education on age-related cognitive decline where decreases in cognitive abilities are as large for higly educated subjects as low educated subjects (Christensen et al, 2007; Tucker-Drob, Johnson, & Jones, 2009; Van Dijk, Van Gerven, Van Boxtel, Van der Elst, & Jolles, 2008; Van Gerven, Meijer, & Jolles, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The current finding of an age-related difference in the accuracy of retrieving items from the outer store in the absence of consistent concurrent age-related differences in access speed is consistent with earlier studies (Leonards, Ibanez, & Giannakopoulos, 2002;Mattay et al, 2006;Missonnier et al, 2004;Van Gerven et al, 2007;Van Gerven et al, in press;Verhaeghen & Hoyer, 2007), and important because it suggests an alternative account of age differences in working memory. One influential theory posits that age differences in working memory performance might be tied to a slowing down of basic processes (Salthouse, 1996), and that basic speed mediates some of the age-related variance in span tasks (Verhaeghen & Salthouse, 1997).…”
Section: Age-related Effectssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Younger adults showed a non-significant RT search slope in the outer store (a finding replicated by Verhaeghen et al, 2004); older adults showed a slope of about 70 ms/N. Older adults also showed greater decreases in accuracy than younger adults as N increased (see also Van Gerven, Meijer, & Jolles, 2007, for a similar dissociation in response times and accuracy for middle-aged and younger adults). As additional evidence of the dissociation, Missonnier et al (2004) and Mattay et al (2006) both demonstrated greater age differences in accuracy at N = 2 than N = 1, but not response times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Sharit, 1993, 1998) or reaction time exercises (e.g. Van Gerven et al, 2007;Kolev et al, 2006). These put significant time pressure on participants.…”
Section: The Cognitive Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%