“…Looking at the institutional imperatives, we note that 53% of ISSs addressed the need for and the significance of creating new orientations, mechanisms and/or organizations to strengthen people's participation in decision‐making for justice, burden‐sharing and democracy – and thus sustainability. Seven per cent addressed the need to strengthen people's participation by means of organizations, for example, the EcoDesign Course that encouraged students and teachers to share ideas on SD, the quality of human life and how business interests complemented such ideas (Bergea et al ., ), or the Community‐Based Land‐Use Planning (C‐LUP) policy implemented by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) that allowed local communities to lead planning discussions and also to allow the exchange of information across other first nations, local communities, NGOs and industry (O'Flaherty et al ., ). Twenty‐nine per cent of all articles focused on the need for more participatory mechanism, for example, workshops to provide a platform for stakeholders in three sustainability projects to discover relevant sustainability questions to tackle, how to approach them and to exchange findings in a collaborative knowledge sharing and creation environment (Vandermeulen and van Huylenbroeck, ), or the development of a mental map method based on an initiative to encourage participation in decision‐making processes, accounting for different locally structured realities, which was then given to policy‐makers (Pfeiffer et al ., ).…”