2021
DOI: 10.12775/jehs.2021.11.08.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education in Poland during Covid-19 pandemic

Abstract: Introduction and purpose. Due to the outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic polish government in March 2020 decided to directs students to remote learning. This condition last -with minor exceptions- one and half year.Material and method. The aim of the study was an evaluation of public experience and attitude towards online learning.Results. All the respondents between March and May 2020 learned via online devices. The average note for e-learning was 2,99 in a 5-grade scale, while a score for stationary learning was 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, 'in Slovenia, 80% of teachers "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that most teachers in the school were open to change' (OECD, 2020a, p.3) and their technological capacity was above the OECD average (ibid, p.5). In turn, the analysis of the situation in Poland, which showed the lowest results in evaluating the LMS, reveals that 'the access to the necessary digital devices is not equally distributed across the population' (OECD, 2020b, p.4), and it resulted in technical problems in online learning during the pandemic (Gorecka et al, 2021). Furthermore, as Olszewska (2020) argues, the negative evaluation of online learning may be attributed to psychological not technological barriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, 'in Slovenia, 80% of teachers "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that most teachers in the school were open to change' (OECD, 2020a, p.3) and their technological capacity was above the OECD average (ibid, p.5). In turn, the analysis of the situation in Poland, which showed the lowest results in evaluating the LMS, reveals that 'the access to the necessary digital devices is not equally distributed across the population' (OECD, 2020b, p.4), and it resulted in technical problems in online learning during the pandemic (Gorecka et al, 2021). Furthermore, as Olszewska (2020) argues, the negative evaluation of online learning may be attributed to psychological not technological barriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies analyse domestic and community barriers to learning caused by the COVID-19 pandemic highlighting technological, financial and pedagogical barriers (Habibi et al, 2021). Research conducted in Poland (Zajdel et al, 2021;Gorecka et al, 2021) highlight health issues experienced by teachers and learners as a result of extended periods of time spent in front of computer screens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on using BL in higher education institutions (HEIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been conducted that analyze the choice of a learning management system (LMS) for the online stage and virtual platforms for the face-to-face stage (Baranova et al, 2021;Roman and Plopeanu, 2021), technological and pedagogical readiness of universities to implement BL (Edu et al, 2021;Klimova, 2021;Kucharska and Rostek, 2021;Tomczyk, 2021) and students' satisfaction with BL as a more appropriate form of studies compared to online learning (Finlay et al, 2022;Ionescu et al, 2020). Although some researchers admit a decrease in motivation and engagement (Gorecka et al, 2021) and show students' dissatisfaction with acquiring technical courses applying BL (Mali and Lim, 2021), the majority of students feel positive about attaining their learning outcomes (Baranova et al, 2021). Furthermore, research offers new strategies and models for BL, such as the DLPCA model (Lapitan Jr. et al, 2021), replacing face-to-face sessions with alternative synchronous online meetings using various videoconferencing tools (Meulenbroeks, 2020;Lapitan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%