is one of the regions in the world rarely visited by research on school leadership. Very little is still known about the people that take on the leadership roles, and even less about how they develop their leadership practices, what their educational and professional motivations are or how their efforts translate into school improvement (Flessa et al., 2018;Aravena and Hallinger, 2018). Paradoxically, this does not mean education policies on this matter in the region are stagnant. On the contrary, more and more measures and initiatives are being proposed in different countries aiming at leveraging the potential for change of school principals in the hopes of improving educational quality . Promotion of "school principals' factor" by education authorities is not based on a systematic knowledge nor on an intellectual analysis of the specific social and cultural conditions where this key role is performed (Oplatka, 2019). As such, there is an evident risk of foreign policies being replicated without considering the local context, a situation Steiner-Khamsi ( 2004) aptly termed "policy borrowing". This paper aims to show some elements of the education scenario in Latin America, so that these can be considered when trying to understand school leadership in this particular context.It is true that when talking about school leadership from a "Latin American perspective", a common pitfall is ignoring the great diversity prevalent in this region. Suffice it to say that continental states such as Brazil (with a population of 210 million) or Mexico (population of 127 million) coexist with city-states such as Uruguay (population of 3.5 million). Or that, along megalopolises like São Paulo, Mexico City or Buenos Aires, there is a vast population of over 120 million inhabitants residing in rural areas, with a strong indigenous presence composed of over 500 different ethnicities. The social, demographic, financial and cultural diversity in Latin American societies is reflected in their disparate education systems (Rivas, 2015). Thus, figures from the UNESCO Institute for Statistics on Education show that while upper secondary education completion rate in Peru is 86%, in Mexico it is 59% and in Honduras it is only 38%. Similarly, percentage of overage students in primary education varies from less than 1% in Cuba to 38% in Nicaragua. Also, the percentage of schools with access to drinking water is 83% in Costa Rica, but only 40% in Ecuador. And again, while 88% of schools in Colombia have electricity supply, in Honduras only 48% of schools do so. These systems vary greatly in their levels of decentralisation in the decision-making process regarding education (Rivas et al., 2020). However, there are points of commonality amongst Latin American education systems that should be considered when analysing school leadership practices and that, in our view, challenge the analytical approaches being adopted including current system thinking.A first aspect, linked to the marked poverty and inequality prevailing in society, has to do with...