2015
DOI: 10.17507/tpls.0511.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational Environment (Coeducation / Segregated) and the Progress of Speaking Ability among Iranian EFL Students

Abstract: Abstract-Coeducation environment _which in Iran is just enjoyed in universities_ is an unfamiliar educational environment for Iranian students and may influence the total outcome of teaching and learning. The present research focuses on the impact of coeducation on speaking ability. A longitudinal study was undertaken on 20 subjects, chosen from 2 universities in which both coeducation and single-sex education were enjoyed. The probable influence of sex, family income, language proficiency, and extroversion/in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In different African case studies, Lee and Lockheed (1990), Mbilizi (2010), Picho and Stephens (2012) (as cited in Evans 2014) have reported the positive result of single-sex (girls') schools on academic achievement of girls. Besides academic achievement, some researchers have pointed out a positive impact of single-sex schools on speaking abilities (Ebrahimi and Yarahmadzehi, 2015), self-esteem (Sullivan, 2009), participation in physical activities and subject selection (Spielhofer, Benton and Schagen, 2004). Co-educational settings have been considered as risky environment for girls where girls are marginalized and belittled (Francis 2000, Jackson andBisset 2005;Jackson 2010;Pahlke, Bigler and Patterson 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In different African case studies, Lee and Lockheed (1990), Mbilizi (2010), Picho and Stephens (2012) (as cited in Evans 2014) have reported the positive result of single-sex (girls') schools on academic achievement of girls. Besides academic achievement, some researchers have pointed out a positive impact of single-sex schools on speaking abilities (Ebrahimi and Yarahmadzehi, 2015), self-esteem (Sullivan, 2009), participation in physical activities and subject selection (Spielhofer, Benton and Schagen, 2004). Co-educational settings have been considered as risky environment for girls where girls are marginalized and belittled (Francis 2000, Jackson andBisset 2005;Jackson 2010;Pahlke, Bigler and Patterson 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teacher defended portraying male roles in the image as realistic and fair. The learning morale of female students gets destroyed when they see images representing women as beings confined at home (Ebrahimi & Yarahmadzehi, 2015;Smyth, 2010). The student recalls the situation calmly, indicating that her frustration had reduced as the female role in society changed.…”
Section: Students Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In different African case studies, Lee and Lockheed (1990), Mbilizi (2010) and Picho and Stephens (2012; as cited in Evans, 2014) have reported the positive effect of single sex (girls) schools on the academic achievement of girls. Besides academic achievement, some researchers have pointed out the positive impact of single sex schools on speaking abilities (Ebrahimi & Yarahmadzehi, 2015), self-esteem (Sullivan, 2009), participation in physical activities and subject selection (Spielhofer, Benton, & Schagen, 2004), and co-educational settings have been considered as a risky environment for girls where girls are marginalised and belittled (Francis, 2000; Jackson, 2010; Jackson & Bisset, 2005; Pahlke, Bigler, & Patterson, 2014). In parallel, there have been studies which highlight the disadvantages associated with single-sex schools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%