Educational inequalities in mental disorders in the Czech Republic: data from CZEch Mental health Study (CZEMS)

Kuklová, Marie; Kågström, Anna; Kučera, Matěj; Mladá, Karolína; Winkler, Petr; Čermáková, Pavla

doi:10.1007/s00127-020-01930-9

Cited by 7 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, in their review focusing on LMICs, Patel and Kleinman (2003: 611) concluded that 'illiteracy or poor education is a consistent risk factor for common mental disorders'. These findings on education are consistent with more recent studies, such as that of Kuklová et al (2020) in the Czech Republic, who identified a relationship between lower education attainment and higher odds of mental disorders, measured using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Sheehan et al, 1998).…”

Section: Background Literaturesupporting

confidence: 90%

Does Multidimensional Poverty Affect Depression? Evidence from Peru

Barrantes

Clausen

2021

Progress in Development Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of people in low- and middle-income countries who suffer from depression is increasing, and a significant proportion of people in these countries live in poverty. We estimated the effect of living in multidimensional poverty on experiencing symptoms associated with major depression using the 2018 Peruvian Demographic and Health Survey. We used an instrumental variables approach to overcome the potential endogeneity bias caused by the simultaneous relationship between multidimensional poverty and depression. We found that living in multidimensional poverty significantly increases depression symptom severity. This has urgent policy implications for low- and middle-income countries with limited provision of mental health services.

show abstract

Section: Background Literaturesupporting

confidence: 90%

Does Multidimensional Poverty Affect Depression? Evidence from Peru

Barrantes

Clausen

2021

Progress in Development Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is consistent with previous study conducted in China 42 . Compared to individuals with higher education level, those educated below high school graduation had higher risk of mental disorders 43 – 45 . We inferred that infertile couples with higher education level may be more likely to acquire knowledge about infertility, or have a better way to seek professional assistance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

The associations between infertility-related stress, family adaptability and family cohesion in infertile couples

Lei

You

Luo

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To explore the association between infertility-related stress, family adaptability and family cohesion in infertile couples and the determinants of infertility-related stress in infertile couples. Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI) and Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACESII-CV) were used to measure the infertility-related stress and family adaptability and cohesion of infertile couples. T-test, ANOVA and multiple comparisons (LSD) were conducted to compare the FPI scores of different demographic characteristics subgroups. Stepwise multivariate linear regression was used to explore the determinants of infertility-related stress. Women had greater global stress than men (P < 0.001). Women scored higher on desired family adaptability, cohesion dissatisfaction and adaptive dissatisfaction than men (P = 0.039, P = 0.036, P = 0.008). FPI scores were higher in men and women who lived in rural (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). Family cohesion and education level was negatively correlated with infertility-related stress in men. Family adaptability and education level was negatively correlated with infertility-related stress in women. Healthcare providers should pay more attention and give more support to infertile couples who lived in rural or with low education level, and provide easier medical accessing for them. Moreover, healthcare providers should value more the family function and family support in intervention of reducing infertility-related stress.

show abstract

“…Of the suitable 12 studies, three were conducted in the United States of America [ 28 – 30 ], two in Scotland [ 31 , 32 ], one multinational study was conducted in Russia, Poland and Czech Republic [ 33 ] and one study was conducted in each of the following countries: Brazil [ 34 ], Iran [ 35 ], Canada [ 36 ], Sweden [ 37 ], United Kingdom [ 38 ], and Czech Republic [ 39 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The population’s race was reported in four studies [ 28 , 30 , 34 , 38 ], with the reported groups being White, Black, Dark, African American, Native American, Asian, Hispanic and other race/ethnicities. Education level was reported in six studies, with this being school level (primary – university) in four studies [ 29 , 33 , 36 , 39 ]. In exploring education, different parameters were used.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Utilising quantitative methods to study the intersectionality of multiple social disadvantages in women with common mental disorders: a systematic review

Alghamdi,

Dunn,

Cairns

et al. 2023

Int J Equity Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Women are at greater risk of common mental disorders. The intersectionality concept provides a framework to examine the effects of multiple social disadvantages on women’s mental health. We conducted a systematic review to collect and analyse information to identify the quantitative methodologies and study designs used in intersectional research to examine women’s mental health and multiple social disadvantages. Included studies used accepted statistical methods to explore the intersectional effects of gender and one or more types of social disadvantage from the PROGRESS-Plus inequity framework: a place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/ sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status, social capital (O’Neill et al. J Clin Epidemiol 67:56–64, 2014). The scope of this systematic review was limited to studies that analysed common mental disorders in women and men comparatively. Studies focusing on only one gender were excluded, ensuring a comprehensive comparative analysis of the intersection of social disadvantages in mental health.Twelve papers were included in the narrative synthesis (Table 1). Eight of the included papers (67%) reported an intersectional effect of gender and one or more additional types of social disadvantage. The multiplicative effect of gender and socioeconomic status on the risk of common mental disorders was the most commonly reported interaction. This systematic review shows that multiplicative and simultaneous interactions of multiple social disadvantage increase the risk of common mental disorders experienced by women. Moreover, it underlines the potential for quantitative research methods to complement qualitative intersectionality research on gender and mental health. The findings of this systematic review highlight the importance of multiple social disadvantage in understanding the increased risk of mental health experienced by women.

show abstract

Educational inequalities in mental disorders in the Czech Republic: data from CZEch Mental health Study (CZEMS)

Cited by 7 publications

References 54 publications

Does Multidimensional Poverty Affect Depression? Evidence from Peru

Does Multidimensional Poverty Affect Depression? Evidence from Peru

The associations between infertility-related stress, family adaptability and family cohesion in infertile couples

Utilising quantitative methods to study the intersectionality of multiple social disadvantages in women with common mental disorders: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About