Educational infrastructures and organisational memory: Observations from a Swedish perspective

Abstract

This article focuses on the interplay between the concepts of ‘educational infrastructure’ and ‘organisational memory’. Using data from collaboration between a Swedish university and a local municipality, the article draws attention to the interplay between three nation-wide improvement programmes and their educational infrastructures, and the knowledge developed and stored in the local schools. The data analysis is supported by the theoretical concept of organisational memory built up by ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ forms of knowledge. The findings show that primarily soft types of knowledge were developed and stored in organisational memory in the local schools. The programmes, therefore, became highly dependent on leaders’ and teachers’ personal knowledge and commitment, in-job training, imitation and socialisation. Regarding hard types of knowledge, for example, clear guidelines, organisational routines, processes and roles for improvement work, the programmes and their infrastructures were, generally, less supportive. These findings illuminate the importance of an organisational learning perspective in successful school system improvement.

Intertribal conflict, educational development and education crisis in Yemen: A call for saving education

“…A country's development can be measured by its ability to provide essential services for its citizens through educational infrastructure (Badu et al, 2018). Regardless of the type of educational infrastructure, it leads to social and educational stability (Demintseva, 2019) and assists in developing hard and soft knowledge in societies (Nordholm & Liljenberg, 2018). Further, educational infrastructure promotes urbanisation and equal economic distribution among urban and rural areas (Campos et al, 2018).…”

Distributed school leadership: Making sense of the educational infrastructure

“…Educational infrastructure is conventionally referred to as classrooms, laboratories and playing fields where learning takes place, but also to curricular materials, student assessments, teacher training and so on that enable schools to enact their visions (Mehta and Fine, 2015). Previous research emphasizes the relationship between educational infrastructure and local practice, meaning that examining educational infrastructure requires attention to both the structures and the activities in themselves and how local actors reshape and make sense of them (Hopkins and Woulfin, 2015;Nordholm and Liljenberg, 2018). Diamond and Spillane (2016) add to the more conventional understanding of the concept of educational infrastructure by emphasizing the importance of situational aspects in their distinction between what they call obvious and less obvious components.…”