Educational Methods as Commodities within European Education: A Norwegian-Danish Case

Abstract

A number of studies in the past few decades address how the governing of educational systems are changing as a result of intensified measurement and use of statistics. This article suggests that another consequence may be the construction of solutions, tools, and methods which target the problems constructed through comparable indicators and benchmarks. An increased proliferation and accessibility of models, methods, and outcomes has inspired both governments and practitioners to look beyond their national borders for solutions to specific problems or challenges. As a consequence, ideas, methods, and approaches increasingly resemble commodities in the global marketplace. The article investigates the diffusion of a method for school development, namely the model for learning environment and pedagogical analysis (the LP-model). The model was developed in Norway in 2005 and later spread to a number of schools and municipalities across the country, and subsequently to Denmark. We analyse the cross-national borrowing process by applying the framework of policy borrowing. The framework serves as a heuristic in our analysis of information from the LP-model's websites, evaluation reports and booklets. The analysis shows that similar descriptions of problems and high policy expectations for addressing the problems constitute central preconditions for the borrowing process. We also find that claims that the model works play an important part in marketing the model. Moreover, the model was warranted by high-profile researchers in Norway and Denmark constituting powerful personal and professional networks.

Auctioning out education: On exogenous privatisation through public procurement

“…By choosing to focus on how the presence of private providers in public education is organised in the case of Swedish MAE, we have limited our attention to only one national case and processes of exogenous privatisation. As such, our findings serve only as an example of such processes, albeit an important one considering that market-oriented policy ideas have been known to travel across national contexts within Europe (Ottesen et al, 2013; Rönnberg, 2015). Furthermore, focusing on contract notices, policy documents and interviews with municipal officials in charge of MAE has allowed us to unpack how the municipalities want to organise the involvement of private providers.…”

How does it Feel to Become a Master’s Student?

“…In particular, schools are seen as a stronghold for democracy and the welfare state, the purpose of schooling being grounded firmly within the broader "Bildung" tradition. In comparative educational research, transfer or borrowing of policy and practice is a recurring theme, and the dominating understanding of entrepreneurship education may be seen as an example of borrowing of policy (Ottesen et al, 2013) and this understanding of entrepreneurship may challenge the "Bildung" tradition (Lund, 2010). In this notion, the concept of education becomes a lifelong process of human development, rather than gaining certain external knowledge or skills, and individuals are valued as unique creatures.…”

En praksisnær vending i skolepsykologien? - udforskning af betingelser for samarbejde mellem skolen og PPR

“…beskriver en eskalering af standarder i laereres og paedagogers arbejde og fremhaever et lignende dilemma ved kritisk at stille spørgsmålet: "Hvordan kan koncepter og diskurser vaere egnet for paedagogisk praksis, hvor alt er relativt -ikke absolut -og hvor ikke to børn eller to klasser er ens?". Dette spørgsmål vil jeg vende tilbage til, når jeg udfolder begrebet om udforskende samarbejdspraksisser senere i kapitlet, men det er inddraget her for at illustrere, hvordan der også er beskrevet problemstillinger knyttet til, at standarder forstås som nogle, der kan overføres uaendrede på tvaers af praksisser i laereres og paedagogers arbejde i skoler og daginstitutioner.Ifølge Pettersvold og Østrem (2019a) samtOttesen et al (2013) er professionelles arbejde i skoler og børnehaver blevet en vare, der forhandles på markedsvilkår blandt private og offentlige aktører, hvilket stiller krav til de professionelle om at kunne vurdere, hvilke aspekter af standarderne der er fagligt underbyggede, og hvilke der i højere grad er begrundet i økonomiske og politiske interesser. De paedagogiske standarder kommer ifølgeDahlbaek et al (2023) ud i institutionerne i, hvad de definerer som modebølger, der…”

“…Forsknings-og evidensbaserede standarder bliver ifølge Pettersvold og Østrem (2019a) ofte forstået som kontekstuafhaengige standarder, der enkelt kan overføres på tvaers af sammenhaenge. Flere har ligeledes rettet kritik mod forskningsbaserede standarder, da de, som forsker i dem og finder positive effekter ved dem, ofte selv er involverede i at udvikle og implementere dem(Ottesen et al, 2013;Pettersvold & Østrem, 2019a). Aabro har ligeledes forsket i standardbaserede organiseringer af professionelles arbejde, og han fremhaever med udgangspunkt i de utrolige år, at det bygger på uigennemsigtige generaliseringer, da denne standard fx haevder at vaere forskningsbaseret på "psykologiske principper om, hvordan adfaerd laeres og…”