“…In recent years, social science studies have not been focusing on offspring when analyzing superdiversity, or at least when taking this conceptual framework into consideration as a whole. 1 Many studies have focused on second-generation adaptation, acculturation or integration through different facets of life and culture, such as language (Cantone, 2019; Stavans and Ashkenazi, 2020; Verhaeghe et al, 2019), religion or spirituality (Bruce, 2020; Falcke et al, 2020; Hoechner, 2020; Parnes et al, 2020; Shen, 2020), legal status (Labussière and Vink, 2020), marriage (Phillips et al, 2020), schooling (Bayona-i-Carrasco et al, 2020; Bissonnette et al, 2019; Chachashvili-Bolotin et al, 2019; Cheng and Yuen, 2019; De Feyter et al, 2020; Demintseva, 2020; Diaz, 2020; Orupabo et al, 2020; Volante et al, 2019), health (Zhu, 2019), employment (Briggs, 2020; Sakamoto and Hsu, 2020), mobilities (Marrow, 2020), national identification and belonginess (Bacchus, 2020; Etienne, 2020; Forrest et al, 2020; Marino, 2020; McClure, 2020; Schaefer and Simon, 2020; Solimene, 2019; Verhaeghe et al, 2020; Zhou and Rodríguez-Mantilla, 2020), political and/or civil society participation or activism (Khachikian, 2019; Le, 2020; Potochnick and Stegmaier, 2020; Terriquez and Lin, 2020), transnational practices (Brocket, 2020; Bruce, 2020; Hernández-León et al, 2020; Jain, 2019; Solimene, 2019), gender (Valdez and Tran, 2020), or attitudes towards others’ cultures (van Maaren and van de Rijt, 2020).…”