2014
DOI: 10.1177/1088357614547891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational Placement of Students With Autism

Abstract: Typically, child characteristics such as IQ and severity of autism symptoms are thought to determine educational placement. The present study examines external factors, including state of residence and state funding formulas, to determine their potential influence on placement outcomes. Findings reveal that considerable variations exist among states in placing students with ASD in inclusive, mainstreaming, self-contained, and separate schools, suggesting that external to the child factors play a major role in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
35
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We noticed that in our analysis (Figure 1), and in previous analyses by P. Smith (2007) and Kurth (2014), states with the largest urban areas tended to be among those with the most restrictive placements. For example, New York State-home to the largest urban school district in the nation (i.e., New York City Department of Education)-has the lowest proportion of students with developmental disabilities placed in general education classrooms more than 80% of the school day, and the third highest proportion of students placed in segregated settings (U.S. Department of Education, 2014).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We noticed that in our analysis (Figure 1), and in previous analyses by P. Smith (2007) and Kurth (2014), states with the largest urban areas tended to be among those with the most restrictive placements. For example, New York State-home to the largest urban school district in the nation (i.e., New York City Department of Education)-has the lowest proportion of students with developmental disabilities placed in general education classrooms more than 80% of the school day, and the third highest proportion of students placed in segregated settings (U.S. Department of Education, 2014).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Identifying state-by-state and regional differences might offer opportunities for more targeted advocacy that could make a stronger impact than broad national efforts. State and regional differences in educational placement of students with developmental disabilities have not been studied thoroughly, although the few researchers who have published on this topic note tremendous variability between states that are the most inclusive and those that are the most restrictive (Kurth, 2014;P. Smith, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disability labels also are associated with more or less restrictive placements. Regional differences in placement in general education classes were found for students with autism (Kurth, 2014). Department of Education, 2013).…”
Section: Student Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to consider learning and behavioral characteristics separately from disability label, because these phenomena function differently in relationship to decisions about content and context. Kurth andMastergeorge (2010a, 2010b) found no relationship between students' intelligence and adaptive behavior skills, and placement in general education. However, social skills and challenging behaviors are likely to change depending on the context (Carr, 1994), so it is impossible to locate these descriptors as characteristics of the student.…”
Section: Student Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wide variance across states shows rates range from 8% in Washington, DC, to as much as 62% in Iowa. The states found to be the most favorable related to inclusive placement for students with ASD were Colorado, Connecticut, North Dakota, West Virginia, and Iowa (Kurth, 2015).…”
Section: Low Rate Of Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%