Educational roles as a continuum of mentoring’s role in medicine – a systematic review and thematic analysis of educational studies from 2000 to 2018

Abstract

BackgroundRecent studies have gone to great lengths to differentiate mentoring from teaching, tutoring, role modelling, coaching and supervision in efforts to better understand mentoring processes. This review seeks to evaluate the notion that teaching, tutoring, role modelling, coaching and supervision may in fact all be part of the mentoring process. To evaluate this theory, this review scrutinizes current literature on teaching, tutoring, role modelling, coaching and supervision to evaluate their commonalities with prevailing concepts of novice mentoring.MethodsA three staged approach is adopted to evaluate this premise. Stage one involves four systematic reviews on one-to-one learning interactions in teaching, tutoring, role modelling, coaching and supervision within Internal Medicine, published between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2018. Braun and Clarke’s (2006) approach to thematic analysis was used to identify key elements within these approaches and facilitate comparisons between them.Stage two provides an updated view of one-to-one mentoring between a senior physician and a medical student or junior doctor to contextualise the discussion.Stage three infuses mentoring into the findings delineated in stage one.ResultsSeventeen thousand four hundred ninety-nine citations were reviewed, 235 full-text articles were reviewed, and 104 articles were thematically analysed. Four themes were identified – characteristics, processes, nature of relationship, and problems faced in each of the four educational roles.ConclusionsRole modelling, teaching and tutoring, coaching and supervision lie within a mentoring spectrum of increasingly structured interactions, assisted by assessments, feedback and personalised support that culminate with a mentoring approach. Still requiring validation, these findings necessitate a reconceptualization of mentoring and changes to mentor training programs and how mentoring is assessed and supported.

Combined novice, near-peer, e-mentoring palliative medicine program: A mixed method study in Singapore

“…Addressing these issues must be a priority for CNEP program designers and administrators. Fulfilling CNEP mentoring potential must be informed by closer scrutiny of the accounts of ethical issues in mentoring highlighted in recent reviews [22] and supplemented by new systematic reviews of training and coordination of mentoring efforts and mentoring dynamics between mentors and near peer mentors. It is only with these insights and effective support from host organizations can CNEP mentoring play its role in medical education.…”

Preceptoring, proctoring, mentoring, and coaching in surgery

“…The mentee needs to take an active part in defining various goals and objectives and in seeking guidance from the mentor to achieve these goals and objectives. The motivation and commitment of both the mentor and the mentee are key to developing an effective mentor‐mentee relationship and creating an appropriate mentoring environment 21 . To increase the likelihood of success, the mentee should play an active role in selecting his or her mentor, and the mentor should also be convinced that this is a good match.…”

Ten Leadership Principles from the Military Applied to Critical Care

“…Mentorship has been defined as “the dynamic, context dependent, goal sensitive, mutually beneficial relationship between an experienced clinician and junior clinicians that is focused upon advancing the development of the mentee” ( 10 ). Mentorship provides career enhancement for mentees in the form of academic productivity, job satisfaction, and professional promotion but also personal improvement with respect to identity formation, sense of self-worth, and wellness ( 11 ). As a bonus, mentoring also advances the career and wellness of the mentor.…”