Educational Technologies in Problem-Based Learning in Health Sciences Education: A Systematic Review

Abstract

BackgroundAs a modern pedagogical philosophy, problem-based learning (PBL) is increasingly being recognized as a major research area in student learning and pedagogical innovation in health sciences education. A new area of research interest has been the role of emerging educational technologies in PBL. Although this field is growing, no systematic reviews of studies of the usage and effects of educational technologies in PBL in health sciences education have been conducted to date.ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to review new and emerging educational technologies in problem-based curricula, with a specific focus on 3 cognate clinical disciplines: medicine, dentistry, and speech and hearing sciences. Analysis of the studies reviewed focused on the effects of educational technologies in PBL contexts while addressing the particular issue of scaffolding of student learning.MethodsA comprehensive computerized database search of full-text articles published in English from 1996 to 2014 was carried out using 3 databases: ProQuest, Scopus, and EBSCOhost. Eligibility criteria for selection of studies for review were also determined in light of the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) guidelines. The population was limited to postsecondary education, specifically in dentistry, medicine, and speech and hearing sciences, in which PBL was the key educational pedagogy and curriculum design. Three types of educational technologies were identified as interventions used to support student inquiry: learning software and digital learning objects; interactive whiteboards (IWBs) and plasma screens; and learning management systems (LMSs).ResultsOf 470 studies, 28 were selected for analysis. Most studies examined the effects of learning software and digital learning objects (n=20) with integration of IWB (n=5) and LMS (n=3) for PBL receiving relatively less attention. The educational technologies examined in these studies were seen as potentially fit for problem-based health sciences education. Positive outcomes for student learning included providing rich, authentic problems and/or case contexts for learning; supporting student development of medical expertise through the accessing and structuring of expert knowledge and skills; making disciplinary thinking and strategies explicit; providing a platform to elicit articulation, collaboration, and reflection; and reducing perceived cognitive load. Limitations included cumbersome scenarios, infrastructure requirements, and the need for staff and student support in light of the technological demands of new affordances.ConclusionsThis literature review demonstrates the generally positive effect of educational technologies in PBL. Further research into the various applications of educational technology in PBL curricula is needed to fully realize its potential to enhance problem-based approaches in health sciences education.

Rethinking Anatomy: How to Overcome Challenges of Medical Education’s Evolution

“…57 The introduction of computer integrated systems in Anatomy Education lends itself to a better analysis of the teaching-learning-assessment dimensions, at the same time, delivering new environments to that processes. Moreover, it became possible to analyse the learning process and provide multimedia resources and out-ofschool access to educational content (CAL platforms), [33][34][35] to assess Anatomy content and collect/analyse inherent data of students' performance (CBA platforms) 58 and to manage and distribute this content (LMS). 32 In fact, coupling LA systems with CAL and CBA platforms, allows the overview of: learners' learning activity, the usage of the available pedagogic resources and the quality of the examinations performed (by evaluating the metric data associated with the examination and with each question -difficult index, discrimination index, Cronbach's alpha, among others measures) and, consequently, correlating this information with learners' performance.…”

Education Strategies Through Simulation For Training In Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Treatment

“…Fidelity is the approach parameter to reality, whose environment has specific characteristics of the scenario: clinic, hospital room, infirmary, clinic or home. The roles of the research participants are defined previously to the simulation, and a clinic case of the "patient" should be a challenge with possible solution [13]. Feedback should happen immediately after the simulation, observing the principles of appropriateness, frequency and interaction [10][11][12][13].…”

Guest Editors’ Introduction: Special Issue on Problem-based Learning in Health Professions Education/Toward Advancement of Problem-Based Learning Research and Practice in Health Professions Education: Motivating Learners, Facilitating Processes, and Supporting with Technology

“…With the development of technology, PBL has evolved from working on paper-based problems in a face-to-face setting to integrating a rich variety of emerging technologies to augment problem presentation, analysis and solution, small group collaboration, tutor facilitation, and assessment of learning (Jin & Bridges, 2014). In their review of emerging technologies used in PBL curricula in health sciences education, Jin and Bridges (2014) found a number of positive outcomes afforded by technology-rich PBL environments, including providing rich, authentic problems and/or case contexts for learning; supporting student development of medical expertise through the accessing and structuring of expert knowledge and skills; making disciplinary thinking and strategies explicit; providing a platform to elicit articulation, collaboration and reflection; and reducing perceived cognitive load.…”

“…In their review of emerging technologies used in PBL curricula in health sciences education, Jin and Bridges (2014) found a number of positive outcomes afforded by technology-rich PBL environments, including providing rich, authentic problems and/or case contexts for learning; supporting student development of medical expertise through the accessing and structuring of expert knowledge and skills; making disciplinary thinking and strategies explicit; providing a platform to elicit articulation, collaboration and reflection; and reducing perceived cognitive load.…”