2023
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG and pupillometric signatures of working memory overload

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, tasks that involved retaining and manipulating more memory items also showed an increase in theta power. Altogether these findings support the idea that theta activity is linked to executive control with more complex mental manipulations (Berger et al, 2014;Griesmayr et al, 2010) and higher memory load (Kosachenko et al, 2023) requiring stronger theta engagement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Moreover, tasks that involved retaining and manipulating more memory items also showed an increase in theta power. Altogether these findings support the idea that theta activity is linked to executive control with more complex mental manipulations (Berger et al, 2014;Griesmayr et al, 2010) and higher memory load (Kosachenko et al, 2023) requiring stronger theta engagement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Whenever task demands become too high, observers experience “overload” and give up on the task. Giving up is accompanied by drops in pupillary dilation indicating reduced exerted effort (Granholm et al, 1996; Kahneman, 1973), which is in line with inverted‐U patterns in frontal and parietal activity with increased task load (Kosachenko et al, 2023; Leung et al, 2004; Linden et al, 2003) (also see Ma et al, 2014). Such pupillary dilation effects during maintenance may be informative regarding the format of VWM representations (i.e., slots (Luck & Vogel, 1997, 2013; Zhang & Luck, 2008) vs. resources accounts (Bays & Husain, 2008; Ma et al, 2014)).…”
Section: Maintenancementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Such pupillary dilation effects during maintenance may be informative regarding the format of VWM representations (i.e., slots (Luck & Vogel, 1997, 2013; Zhang & Luck, 2008) vs. resources accounts (Bays & Husain, 2008; Ma et al, 2014)). Although direct studies into this issue remain scarce, some work has provided indirect indications into this debate without strong support for either account (see Kosachenko et al, 2023; Kursawe & Zimmer, 2015; Zhou et al, 2022). Targeted studies are necessary to reveal how pupillometry may inform about the format of VWM representations.…”
Section: Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the WM task, we recorded 4 minutes of eyes-closed resting state ECG and PPG. After that, the participants were given instructions and proceeded with the WM task (see Figure 1; for a more detailed description of the task see Kosachenko et al (2023)). In this task, participants were either required to memorize sequences of 5, 9, or 13 digits (memory condition) or to listen to them (control condition) without trying to memorize them.…”
Section: Task and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%