2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icstc.2018.8528652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG-Based Emotion Classification Using Wavelet Decomposition and K-Nearest Neighbor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Kimmatkar et al [32], the classification accuracy using EEG signal to classify human emotions had reached 98.67%. Few studies focused on multi-classification of emotions such as Putra et al who achieved an average accuracy around 60-70% [33]. In this paper, a neural feedback experiment with three experimental stages was designed to study anxiety issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Kimmatkar et al [32], the classification accuracy using EEG signal to classify human emotions had reached 98.67%. Few studies focused on multi-classification of emotions such as Putra et al who achieved an average accuracy around 60-70% [33]. In this paper, a neural feedback experiment with three experimental stages was designed to study anxiety issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wavelet transform is a popular time–frequency (TF) decomposition technique that divides the EEG signal in several approximation and details levels of wavelet coefficients corresponding to various EEG frequency ranges, while conserving the time information of the signal. Previous studies have used wavelet analysis to measure the EEG TF distribution related to emotions [ 13 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. Here, six-level continuous wavelet transform ( CWT ) was applied using the Morlet window function to obtain wavelet coefficients of EEG bands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent papers comparing subject dependent and independent approaches showed that the former consistently gave 5–30% higher performance depending on the implemented approach. Such results are mainly due to the discrepancy between subjects related to how they feel and express their emotions [ 75 ]. For example, Nath et al [ 73 ] have observed that EEG signals from a specific subject were somewhat similar yet significantly varied across different subjects, even when the same stimulus was considered.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%