2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2018.00094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG Based Motor Imagery Classification Using Instantaneous Phase Difference Sequence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [24], an instantaneous phase difference method was implemented to obtain phase-based features by extraction of phase synchrony information among different electrodes; however, the success rate could be further improved with more sophisticated extraction techniques. In literature different spectral signal representation techniques have been used to explore discriminative features for MI EEG signal classification and results suggest that power spectral density (PSD) provides reasonable success rates in comparison with energy distribution, atomic decompositions and wavelet based techniques [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24], an instantaneous phase difference method was implemented to obtain phase-based features by extraction of phase synchrony information among different electrodes; however, the success rate could be further improved with more sophisticated extraction techniques. In literature different spectral signal representation techniques have been used to explore discriminative features for MI EEG signal classification and results suggest that power spectral density (PSD) provides reasonable success rates in comparison with energy distribution, atomic decompositions and wavelet based techniques [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One more restriction is that CSP is more oriented to power-based features [41], so that its validity of the combination with PLV is questionable, as the achieved results definitely indicate. The combination of CSP with CCF and GFC allows for enhancing the performed accuracy, but in DBI MI and DBII ME with a relatively moderate number of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparative purposes, we also perform feature extraction using the baseline CSPbased spatial filtering that is widely used for filtering measures of synchronization [40,41]. To this end, we perform the CSP feature extraction, adjusting the sliding time window length at each evaluated value of τ and fixing the variance of the surrogate space to the first three eigenvectors of the spatial filtering matrix, as suggested in [42].…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [13] coupled the notion of variance of instantaneous phasors with sPLV. Furthermore, they formulated a framework to estimate a linear transform that maximizes the variance of instantaneous phasors across one class while simultaneously minimizing it across the other class.…”
Section: Differential-phase Synchrony Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caramia et al [12] proposed a modified single trial PLV but it did not account for lead lag behavior between EEG signals. Kumar et al [13] proposed to extract features based on Instantaneous Phase Difference (IPD) for trial wise analysis. Further, [14] explored Mean Phase Coherence (MPC) with large and local scale synchrony for fatigue detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%