2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2016.7844738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG based stress level identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the limitation in use of fNIRS signal in the previous researcher, for better comparison, we have used studies in which EEG signal has been used for stress detection. Jun et al 45 and Smitha et al 25 using EEG signal, which has been recorded as 14 channels, the classification accuracy of the inactive state (rest) and active state (stress) has been 96 and 85.17%, respectively. In this research, only using fNIRS signal, the results obtained from the active and inactive states classification are more superior than the findings in other research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the limitation in use of fNIRS signal in the previous researcher, for better comparison, we have used studies in which EEG signal has been used for stress detection. Jun et al 45 and Smitha et al 25 using EEG signal, which has been recorded as 14 channels, the classification accuracy of the inactive state (rest) and active state (stress) has been 96 and 85.17%, respectively. In this research, only using fNIRS signal, the results obtained from the active and inactive states classification are more superior than the findings in other research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jun et al 45 induced high and low stress levels in the volunteers using mathematical and stroop task. During the task, EEG signals were recorded as 14 channels, and based on the features extracted from the recorded signals, the best result in classification between low and high stress levels has been 75%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second limitation relates to the precision of the headset to measure the patient’s stress. While this may seem like a major limitation, there are studies that have determined the accuracy of this sensor can be up to 88–96% when using a two-level classification [ 37 ]. In addition, to reduce any possible erroneous readings provided by the headset, an algorithm is used to smooth any abrupt changes in the readings.…”
Section: Sensors and Actuatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both autonomic and neural responses can distinguish between affective and neutral stimuli across visual and auditory modalities [11], [12], [13], [14] and autonomic and neural responses can both identify stressful situations [15], [16], [17], [18]. Therefore, multimodal synchrony assessment, based on both neural and autonomic channels, could lead to more robust detection of emotionally or cognitively relevant events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%