Even during well-calibrated cognitive tasks, successive brain responses to repeated identical stimulations are highly variable. The source of this variability is believed to reside mainly in fluctuations of the subject's cognitive ''context'' defined by his͞her attentive state, spontaneous thought process, strategy to carry out the task, and so on . . . As these factors are hard to manipulate precisely, they are usually not controlled, and the variability is discarded by averaging techniques. We combined first-person data and the analysis of neural processes to reduce such noise. We presented the subjects with a three-dimensional illusion and recorded their electrical brain activity and their own report about their cognitive context. Trials were clustered according to these first-person data, and separate dynamical analyses were conducted for each cluster. We found that (i) characteristic patterns of endogenous synchrony appeared in frontal electrodes before stimulation. These patterns depended on the degree of preparation and the immediacy of perception as verbally reported. (ii) These patterns were stable for several recordings. (iii) Preparatory states modulate both the behavioral performance and the evoked and induced synchronous patterns that follow. (iv) These results indicated that first-person data can be used to detect and interpret neural processes.
FrameworkW hen a subject is stimulated during an experiment, his͞her brain is not idle or in a state of suspension but is engaged in cognitive activity. The brain response is derived from the active interaction between this cognitive background and the stimulation that disturbs it: the neural response is ''shaped'' by the ongoing activity (refs. 1-5; see ref. 6 for review). As this ongoing state has not been carefully monitored, most of the brain response is not understood: successive exposure to the same stimulus elicits highly variable responses, and this variability is treated as unintelligible noise (6). Although it is common to control, at least indirectly, for some of the factors that condition this ongoing state, such as attention, vigilance, or motivation (for reviews, see refs. 7 and 8), the ongoing activity has not yet been analyzed systematically. One strategy would be to precisely describe the ongoing cognitive activity by obtaining refined verbal reports from human subjects. These should reveal subtle changes in the subject's experience (conditioned, for instance, by his͞her cognitive strategy, attention level, and inner speech). This type of qualitative first-person data is usually omitted from brain-imaging studies. We show that if methodological precautions are taken when gathering first-person data, they can indeed be used to shed light on cognition via a joint analysis with quantitative measures of neural activity.
Collection of First-Person Data: Phenomenological Clusters (PhCs).It is not easy to collect reports about inner experience, because verbal reports can be biased or untrue (9). The definition of a precise and rigorous method to c...