1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00043-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG coherency II: experimental comparisons of multiple measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
209
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
209
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, local measures are reference-dependent and hence functional connectivity measures should be performed on reference-free measurements of neuronal activity (Nunez et al, 1999). Source reconstruction has been proven to be a reliable approach to accurately detect functional connectivity (Gross et al, 2001;Hillebrand et al, 2012;Schoffelen and Gross, 2009).…”
Section: Source Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, local measures are reference-dependent and hence functional connectivity measures should be performed on reference-free measurements of neuronal activity (Nunez et al, 1999). Source reconstruction has been proven to be a reliable approach to accurately detect functional connectivity (Gross et al, 2001;Hillebrand et al, 2012;Schoffelen and Gross, 2009).…”
Section: Source Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the use of surface Laplacians has been encouraged because they are essentially reference-free and additionally reduce the volume conduction effect [Nunez, 1995;Pernier et al, 1988;Perrin et al, 1987Perrin et al, , 1989Schiff, 2005]. Nevertheless, Nunez et al [1997Nunez et al [ , 1999 demonstrated that although surface Laplacian methods remove most of the distortions caused by the common reference electrode and volume conduction, common reference methods, like average reference and digitally linked mastoids, produce reasonably reliable results for longrange coherence. Moreover, the surface Laplacian acts as a spatial band-pass filter of scalp potential, thus emphasizing the locally synchronized sources and deemphasizing the long-range synchronized sources.…”
Section: Reference Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential feature of such models is low skull conductivity compared to brain, CSF, skull, or scalp tissue. This model has been used extensively in simulation studies of surface Laplacians (Nunez et al, 1994;Srinivasan et al, 1996), EEG coherence estimates (Nunez et al, 1997(Nunez et al, ,1999Srinivasan et al, 1998) and forms the basis for a number of approaches to source localization (Lopes da Silva 2004). The thickness and conductivity ratios of the spherical shells are the essential features of the model.…”
Section: Spatial Filtering Of Scalp Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%