2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG reveals the effect of fMRI scanner noise on noise-sensitive subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this problem, a few studies looking at the anatomical correlates of Fmθ used fMRI with simultaneous EEG recording. Despite the fact that fMRI scanner noise may affect mental concentration in some individuals when engaged in mental reasoning tasks (Pripfl et al, 2006), these fMRI studies clearly visualized Fmθ activity localized to the anteromedial frontal cortex (Gevins et al, 1997; Mizuhara et al, 2004; Sammer et al, 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To overcome this problem, a few studies looking at the anatomical correlates of Fmθ used fMRI with simultaneous EEG recording. Despite the fact that fMRI scanner noise may affect mental concentration in some individuals when engaged in mental reasoning tasks (Pripfl et al, 2006), these fMRI studies clearly visualized Fmθ activity localized to the anteromedial frontal cortex (Gevins et al, 1997; Mizuhara et al, 2004; Sammer et al, 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, it can induce stress and annoyance (e.g. Pripfl et al, 2006) which is prone to interact with affective stimulation. While sophisticated fMRI protocols have been developed to reduce the impact of acoustic scanner noise (Amaro et al, 2002;Blackman and Hall, in press;Griffiths et al, 2001;Hall et al, 1999;Hennel et al, 1999;Marcar et al, 2002;Obleser et al, 2007;Yetkin et al, 2003), the fMRI scanner environment (strict movement restrictions; claustrophobic situation) may still interfere with emotional processing at least in some humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we predict an effect of NS on the P1 response, because the differences in early ERP components between noise sensitive and non-sensitive individuals have previously been indicated. Evidence for this comes from scarce electrophysiological research on NS35 and annoyance caused by an unpleasant sound36.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%