2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00142-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EF-hand calcium-binding proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
386
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 483 publications
(396 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
386
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For these mutants, where only one EF hand was left intact, Ca 2ϩ EC 50 values were 34 Ϯ 9 M for EF1 ϩ 2 Ϫ 3 Ϫ , 6.1 Ϯ 0.1 M for EF1 Ϫ 2 ϩ 3 Ϫ , and 7.6 Ϯ 0.6 M for EF1 Ϫ 2 Ϫ 3 ϩ . The Ca 2ϩ sensitivities of EF1 Ϫ 2 ϩ 3 Ϫ or EF1 Ϫ 2 Ϫ 3 ϩ , lower than that of WT, suggest that mutation of either EF hand of the EF2,3 pair reduced the affinity of the remaining EF hand, as reported for other Ca 2ϩ -binding proteins (8,17). Hence, affinities of WT EF2 and EF3 are presumably higher than suggested by the Ca 2ϩ sensitivities of EF1 Ϫ 2 ϩ 3 Ϫ or EF1 Ϫ 2 Ϫ 3 ϩ mutants.…”
Section: Bright and Slodk Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For these mutants, where only one EF hand was left intact, Ca 2ϩ EC 50 values were 34 Ϯ 9 M for EF1 ϩ 2 Ϫ 3 Ϫ , 6.1 Ϯ 0.1 M for EF1 Ϫ 2 ϩ 3 Ϫ , and 7.6 Ϯ 0.6 M for EF1 Ϫ 2 Ϫ 3 ϩ . The Ca 2ϩ sensitivities of EF1 Ϫ 2 ϩ 3 Ϫ or EF1 Ϫ 2 Ϫ 3 ϩ , lower than that of WT, suggest that mutation of either EF hand of the EF2,3 pair reduced the affinity of the remaining EF hand, as reported for other Ca 2ϩ -binding proteins (8,17). Hence, affinities of WT EF2 and EF3 are presumably higher than suggested by the Ca 2ϩ sensitivities of EF1 Ϫ 2 ϩ 3 Ϫ or EF1 Ϫ 2 Ϫ 3 ϩ mutants.…”
Section: Bright and Slodk Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The effect of N 26 D likely results from an increased EF1 affinity, consistent with the replacement of the polar Ca 2ϩ -binding asparagine residue by a negatively charged residue. The effect of E 35 G seems paradoxical, given that this mutation removes an essential Ca 2ϩ -binding side chain (8,17). This can be resolved by assuming that EF1 has lower Ca 2ϩ affinity than EF2 and EF3, and that E 35 G impairs EF1 contribution to the response to Ca 2ϩ .…”
Section: Bright and Slodk Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data that are currently available support a structural role for the metal, which is not surprising given the extraordinary number and diversity of proteins in which it plays a central role in conferring structural stability (Kretsinger and Nelson 1976;Lewit-Bentley and Rety 2000;Strynadka and James 1989). The new structural information that's available showing the metal to be linked to Mn by carboxylate bridges is consistent with a structural function.…”
Section: Why Does the Oec Contain Ca 2+ ?mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The signaling function of Ca 2+ is also essential as an intracellular ''second messenger'' that transduces signals received by the cell exterior (Bootman and Berridge 1995). In this system, the reversible binding of Ca 2+ (K d =~10 -6 -10 -7 M) to EF hand proteins (calmodulins, troponin C, calbindin, and so on (Strynadka and James 1989;Lewit-Bentley and Rety 2000)) provides a sensitive monitoring system, that couples cellular metabolism to signals arriving at the cell surface. Unfortunately, these functions and the wealth of structural and functional data derived from them provide little in the way of comparative information that can be used to sort out another major function of Ca 2+ , that of an essential cofactor of the inorganic ion complex (4Mn, Ca 2+ , Cl -) in PSII that oxidizes H 2 O to O 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%