2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.semerg.2011.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efectividad de un programa de intervención socio-motriz en población mayor con riesgo social

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the important results obtained in this study in terms of FFCs’ anxiety and subjective burden contrast with limited results obtained in these variables with the traditional caregiver care programmes. Furthermore, using a group intervention and monitoring from PC physiotherapy, we achieved similar or superior (in some variables) results when compared to those of other studies [ 55 , 101 ] that followed an individual strategy at caregivers’ homes with monitoring by a trainer. The group intervention represents a strategy for saving both economic and human resources, which makes the development of this strategy feasible for PC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the important results obtained in this study in terms of FFCs’ anxiety and subjective burden contrast with limited results obtained in these variables with the traditional caregiver care programmes. Furthermore, using a group intervention and monitoring from PC physiotherapy, we achieved similar or superior (in some variables) results when compared to those of other studies [ 55 , 101 ] that followed an individual strategy at caregivers’ homes with monitoring by a trainer. The group intervention represents a strategy for saving both economic and human resources, which makes the development of this strategy feasible for PC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…By including 68 individuals in the sample, we can obtain an 80% power to detect differences of two points when testing equality of SF-36 summary of physical health means [ 53 , 54 , 55 ], with a type I error of 5%. For this calculation, we assume a standard deviation of around 7.46 [ 53 ] and an attrition rate of around 15%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el recogido de trabajos se encuentra estudios que evalúan la CV tras la realización de actividades físicas (n = 17) 11,15,16,[19][20][21]24,[27][28][29][30][32][33][34][35][36][37] , educativas (n = 4) 13,17,22,23 y mixtas (n = 6) 12,14,18,25,26,31 .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…6) Niveles de evidencia científica Destacar que, los estudios recogidos corresponden a los niveles de evidencia científica siguientes: 1.c estudio randomizado controlado (RCT) [14][15][16][19][20][21][22][23]25,[30][31][32][33]35 , 1.d pseudo-RCT 13,24 , 2.c Estudio cuasi experimental controlado 11,26 , 2.d pre-test -post-test o test grupo control histórico/ retrospectivo 12 , 3.d estudio caso-control 17,18,34,36 , 3.e estudio observacional sin grupo control 27,29 y 4.b estudio transversal 28,37 según la clasificación Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) 10 .…”
Section: Métodounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation