2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0210-5691(07)74814-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efectividad y seguridad de la «triple antiagregación» en pacientes sometidos a intervencionismo coronario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the available studies that analyze the cost‐effectiveness of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in NSTE‐ACS patients rely on placebo‐controlled clinical trials [10,19,37–40], which do not inform about the incremental benefits and risks of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. Fortunately, some recent studies provide adequate evidence on the efficacy and safety of triple antiplatelet therapy in these patients [8,9]. This evidence allows the assessment of the efficiency of this therapy in patients already treated with clopidogrel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To date, the available studies that analyze the cost‐effectiveness of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in NSTE‐ACS patients rely on placebo‐controlled clinical trials [10,19,37–40], which do not inform about the incremental benefits and risks of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. Fortunately, some recent studies provide adequate evidence on the efficacy and safety of triple antiplatelet therapy in these patients [8,9]. This evidence allows the assessment of the efficiency of this therapy in patients already treated with clopidogrel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main source of evidence about the comparative effectiveness and safety of triple versus double antiplatelet therapy was a recent systematic review and meta‐analysis [9] based on nine randomized controlled trials. According to this review, the addition of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors reduced the risk of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days in those trials that included patients with NSTE‐ACS (relative risk [RR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56–0.80) but not in studies that excluded NSTE‐ACS patients (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.75–1.53) ( P ‐test of interaction 0.0175).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Este triple tratamiento antiagregante se ha mostrado como beneficioso en múltiples estudios [44][45][46][47] (clase: IIB/NE: B).…”
Section: Prasugrelunclassified