2016
DOI: 10.14583/2318-7670.v04n06a05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito dos Sistemas Conservacionistas do Solo e Residual do Gesso sobre a Cultura da Soja

Abstract: RESUMO:O experimento obteve o intuito de estudar as sequencias de manejos conservacionistas do solo sobre os atributos de produção da soja. O estudo foi realizado na área experimental da fazenda de Pesquisa e Extensão pertencente a UNESP, Campus de Ilha Solteira -SP. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos ao acaso, com quatro sistemas de cultivo: Plantio Direto Contínuo (SPD-SPD) e Alternado (SPD-CM), Cultivo Mínimo Contínuo (CM-CM) e Alternado (CM-SPD) com ou sem o uso de gesso. Foram avaliadas as caract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without water deficiency, soybean had a low probability of responding to gypsum (37%), and the probability of crop yield increasing more than 5% in soils with Al saturation >40% was only 20% (Figure 9d). Effect on yield (%) Sávio et al, 2011Caires et al, 2016Minato et al, 2017Costa, 2015Oliveira and Paven, 1998Zandoná et al, 2015Caires et al, 2002Paulleti et al, 2014Michalovicz et al, 2014Vicensi et al, 2016Soratto and Crusciol, 2008aFreitas et al, 2017Meert, 2013Trindade, 2013Soratto and Crusciol 2008bCrusciol et al, 2016Dalla Nora et al, 2017aCaires et al, 1999Dalla Nora and Amado, 2013Sousa et al, 2010Costa and Crusciol, 2016Caires et al, 2004Fois et al, 2017Caires et al, 2011bMarques, 2008Caires et al, 2006Somavilla et al, 2016Tanaka, 2013Caires et al, 2003Arf et al, 2014Rampim et al, 2015Galleto, 2016Fontoura et al, 2018Marchesan et al, 2017Caires et al, 2011aNeis et al, 2010Rampin et al, 2011Soares, 2016Gelain et al, 2014Freitas et al, 2016Castañon et al, 2011Caires et al, 1998Leguizamón, 2017…”
Section: Probability Of a Positive Crop Response To Gypsummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without water deficiency, soybean had a low probability of responding to gypsum (37%), and the probability of crop yield increasing more than 5% in soils with Al saturation >40% was only 20% (Figure 9d). Effect on yield (%) Sávio et al, 2011Caires et al, 2016Minato et al, 2017Costa, 2015Oliveira and Paven, 1998Zandoná et al, 2015Caires et al, 2002Paulleti et al, 2014Michalovicz et al, 2014Vicensi et al, 2016Soratto and Crusciol, 2008aFreitas et al, 2017Meert, 2013Trindade, 2013Soratto and Crusciol 2008bCrusciol et al, 2016Dalla Nora et al, 2017aCaires et al, 1999Dalla Nora and Amado, 2013Sousa et al, 2010Costa and Crusciol, 2016Caires et al, 2004Fois et al, 2017Caires et al, 2011bMarques, 2008Caires et al, 2006Somavilla et al, 2016Tanaka, 2013Caires et al, 2003Arf et al, 2014Rampim et al, 2015Galleto, 2016Fontoura et al, 2018Marchesan et al, 2017Caires et al, 2011aNeis et al, 2010Rampin et al, 2011Soares, 2016Gelain et al, 2014Freitas et al, 2016Castañon et al, 2011Caires et al, 1998Leguizamón, 2017…”
Section: Probability Of a Positive Crop Response To Gypsummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several Brazilian regions, such practices have been satisfactory, when established based on soil analysis and all activities that complement them, followed strictly and efficiently. A soil management system therefore has the purpose of preparing the area for planting crops with efficiency capable of absorbing good results both for the soil and for production through the conditions of a healthy soil and satisfactory growth and development of plants (Freitas et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%