2008
DOI: 10.4257/oeco.2008.1203.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeitos De Diferentes Intervenções No Processo De Eutrofização Do Lago Paranoá (Brasília – Df)

Abstract: RESUMOO monitoramento temporal das variáveis de um corpo d'água possibilita o conhecimento de sua dinâmica e, por fi m, de seu manejo. O Lago Paranoá em Brasília, formado em 1959, passou por um longo período de eutrofi zação. Neste trabalho, usando dados de monitoramento de longa duração da CAESB, os efeitos da instalação de duas Estações de Tratamento de Esgoto (ETE) e de um evento de fl ushing foram avaliados para as variáveis Clorofi la-a, Fósforo Total e Transparência medidas entre 1976 e 2001. Utilizando-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The shortest retention time associated with the greatest outflow was also associated with low Copepoda densities in Barra Bonita according to Santos-Wisniewski and Rocha (2007). A great reduction in phytoplankton biomass associated with the loss of surface water was also reported by Angelini et al (2008) in the Paranoá reservoir, consequently also modifying the aquatic communities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The shortest retention time associated with the greatest outflow was also associated with low Copepoda densities in Barra Bonita according to Santos-Wisniewski and Rocha (2007). A great reduction in phytoplankton biomass associated with the loss of surface water was also reported by Angelini et al (2008) in the Paranoá reservoir, consequently also modifying the aquatic communities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…After an intervention by the Environmental Sanitation Company of the Federal District (CAESB), the reservoir returned to an acceptable level of water quality. Thus, for the most part, the reservoir is considered mesotrophic (Angelini, Bini & Starling ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…80%) (Menezes 2010). As consequence, strong deterioration of water quality occurred in the 1970s (Mattos et al 1992), which was linked to eutrophication (Angelini et al 2008;Padovesi-Fonseca et al 2009) and to massive growth of algae and cyanobacteria (Microcystis aeruginosa). The situation has been substantially improved since the implementation of third-stage treatment for phosphorus removal in the waste water treatment plants in the early 1990s (Grisolia and Starling 2001;Padovesi-Fonseca et al 2009).…”
Section: Water Quality Of Lago Paranoámentioning
confidence: 98%