Effect Analysis of the Introduction of AUTOSAR: A Systematic Literature Review

Dersten, Sara; Axelsson, Jakob; Fröberg, Joakim

doi:10.1109/seaa.2011.44

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They found that after introducing AUTOSAR improvements have been noticed in software complexity, reliability, reusability and flexibility among some other company functions. Comparing the results of [24] to the results of our RQ3, we noticed similarities in the benefits introduced by SOA and AUTOSAR.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 60%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Automotive Service-oriented Architectures: a Systematic Mapping Study

Kukulicic¹,

Samardzic²,

Bucaioni³

et al. 2022

2022 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Service-oriented architecture is a possible solution to the increasing complexity of automotive software systems. We conduct a systematic mapping study investigating the use of service-oriented architecture in automotive software. This study aims at providing information on publication trends, available architectural solutions, main benefits and challenges in automotive service-oriented architecture. From an initial set of 341 peer-reviewed publications, we selected 28 primary studies, which we classified and analysed using a thorough protocol. We provided both quantitative and qualitative analyses using vertical and orthogonal analysis. We found that there has been a significant increase in the number of publications recently, and that the studies focused on defining functionalities and data flow between them. Functionality was found as the most recognized benefit when applying service-oriented architecture in the automotive domain, while security, safety and reliability are the most recognized challenges.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 60%

“…Dersten et al carried out a systematic literature review focusing on the effects of introducing a novel open automotive standard [24]. They found that after introducing AUTOSAR improvements have been noticed in software complexity, reliability, reusability and flexibility among some other company functions.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Automotive Service-oriented Architectures: a Systematic Mapping Study

Kukulicic¹,

Samardzic²,

Bucaioni³

et al. 2022

2022 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Eklund et al [13] discuss the architectural concerns of extending the existing software system with new features. In the automotive domain, Dersten et al [14] present a systematic literature review of the effects of re-factoring the AU-TOSAR architecture such as lower complexity and increased efficiency. Soubra et al [15] use functional size measurement to estimate the development effort for Electronic Control Units (ECUs) 1 based on the AUTOSAR architecture.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 1 shows which features are included in which solution. q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 We can see that a higher increase in the number of changes needed to be implemented to support an additional features Solutions Features s1 Feat 1, 3 s2 Feat 1, 3, 9 s3 Feat 1, 3, 9, 14 s4 Feat 1, 3, 9, 14, 12 s5 Feat 1, 3, 9, 14, 12, 13 s6 Feat 1, 3, 9, 14, 12, 13, 5 s7 Feat 1, 3, 9, 14, 12, 13, 5, 4 s8 Feat 1, 3, 9, 14, 12, 13, 5, 4, 2 s9 Feat 1, 3, 9, 14, 12, 13, 5, 4, 2, 8 s10 Feat 1, 3, 9, 14, 12, 13, 5, 4, 2, 8, 6 s11 Feat 1, 3,9,14,12,13,5,4,...…”

Section: Optimization For the Entire Meta-modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying Optimal Sets of Standardized Architectural Features

Durisic

Staron

Tichy

2015

Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industrial standards are used to formalize procedures, rules and guidelines for the industry to follow. Following a standard requires continuous adoption of the new standardized features where only their subset is required by individual companies. Therefore the prioritization of the features and the assessment of their impact on the development projects is crucial for the success of the project. In software engineering, industrial standards are used increasingly often to standardize a language for designing architectural components of the system by defining domain-specific meta-models. The purpose is to assure the interoperability between a number of software tools exchanging the architectural models. In this paper, we present a method for identifying optimal sets of new standardized architectural features to be adopted in the development projects. The optimization is done based on the assessment of their benefit for the projects and the estimated cost of re-work in the modeling tools according to the changes in the standardized meta-model. We evaluate the method by applying it on 14 new architectural features of a new release of the AUTOSAR standard which is followed in the development of the automotive software systems.

show abstract

“…Systems engineering has been successfully applied to a number of industries, most notably defense, automotive (AUTOSAR) [3] and aerospace. These systems help reduce complexity, allow for reuse of engineering artefacts including software, allow for early system verification, and ultimately support more cost-effective engineering efforts while at the same time reducing errors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey of methods for design of collaborative robotics applications- Why safety is a barrier to more widespread robotics uptake

Saenz

Elkmann

Gibaru

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While collaborative robots have made headlines through recent industrial applications, they are not as widespread in industry as it may seem. The authors of this paper believe that one reason for this slow uptake is due to the high requirements on the safety and the lack of engineering tools for analyzing collaborative robotics applications. Systems engineering provides a good framework for creating the engineering tools needed for faster and more reliable deployment, but has only recently been applied to robotics challenges. In this paper, we discuss the state of the art for designing robotics applications featuring human-robot collaboration (HRC) and then review existing systems engineering approaches, which could offer support. Our review aims to support the robotics community in the future development of engineering tools to better understand, plan, and implement applications featuring collaborative robotics. CCS Concepts • Applied computing➝ Physical sciences and engineering ➝ Engineering➝ Computer-aided design.

show abstract

Effect Analysis of the Introduction of AUTOSAR: A Systematic Literature Review

Cited by 6 publications

References 18 publications

Automotive Service-oriented Architectures: a Systematic Mapping Study

Automotive Service-oriented Architectures: a Systematic Mapping Study

Identifying Optimal Sets of Standardized Architectural Features

Survey of methods for design of collaborative robotics applications- Why safety is a barrier to more widespread robotics uptake

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About