2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40101-016-0096-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect and immediate after-effect of lightly gripping the cane on postural sway

Abstract: BackgroundThis study investigated the effect and after-effect of lightly touching a real cane on postural sway and ankle muscle activity.MethodParticipants performed a single-leg stance (SLS) task with their eyes closed for 30 s under three tasks. In the first and third tasks, the participants performed a normal SLS. In the second task, the participants in light-grip group (n = 11) were asked to perform SLS while lightly gripping a cane with their hand. The participants in depend-on-cane group (n = 11) were as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we used a cane as a way for decreasing body sway during eyes-closed stance. This tool proved to be effective for stabilization, even when the cane exerted <1 N force on the ground, and even when the cane was not fixed to the ground, as in other investigations on this issue (Jeka et al, 1996 ; Maeda et al, 1998 ; Albertsen et al, 2010 ; Ustinova and Langenderfer, 2013 ; Oshita and Yano, 2016 ). Of note, the experiments were conducted under tandem stance, which is a challenging sway situation (Sozzi et al, 2013 ), in order to clearly detect differences between the condition with/without cane touch.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Here, we used a cane as a way for decreasing body sway during eyes-closed stance. This tool proved to be effective for stabilization, even when the cane exerted <1 N force on the ground, and even when the cane was not fixed to the ground, as in other investigations on this issue (Jeka et al, 1996 ; Maeda et al, 1998 ; Albertsen et al, 2010 ; Ustinova and Langenderfer, 2013 ; Oshita and Yano, 2016 ). Of note, the experiments were conducted under tandem stance, which is a challenging sway situation (Sozzi et al, 2013 ), in order to clearly detect differences between the condition with/without cane touch.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Jeka and Lackner [ 15 ] showed a reducing effect of the light fingertip contact to a stationary surface on postural sway and muscle activity during bipedal tandem stance. Moreover, Ohsihita and Yano [ 16 ] measured EMG of TA and gastrocnemius during SLS with light gripping of a cane according to the previous report that a light touch effect is also observed for light grasping of an unstable object [ 34 ]. The authors then calculated CI based on the study by Rudolph et al [ 35 ] and showed a smaller CI with the lightly gripping of the cane during SLS than without the cane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeka and Lackner [ 15 ] showed that the light fingertip contact to stationary surface leads to decreased levels of EMG activity of the lower limb during bipedal standing in young people. Moreover, a light gripping cane leads to decreased muscle co-contraction during SLS in young people [ 16 ]. These findings demonstrated the possibility the haptic sensory information with the light fingertip contact might decrease muscle co-contraction of the ankle joint during SLS even in elderly people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, our participants might have been more used to explore the environment with their dominant hand. An aftereffect on postural sway following an extended duration of lightly gripping a cane was reported by Oshita and Yano [14]. They investigated the effect of lightly touching a cane on postural sway and ankle-joint muscle activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%