Plant Hormone Signal Perception and Transduction 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0131-5_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene and methylenecyclopropane on ethylene binding and ethylene action on cut carnations

Abstract: 1-Methy1cyclopropene (l-MCP), formerly designated as Sis-X, has been shown to be an effective inhibitor of ethylene responses in carnation flowers in either the light or the dark. The binding appears to be to the receptor and to be "permanent". A 6 h treatment at 2.5 nll-1 is sufficient to protect against ethylene, and 0.5 nll-1 is sufficient if exposure is for 24 h. As carnation flowers age, a little higher concentration appears to be needed. Most of the natural increase in ethylene production during senescen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
74
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1D shows that seedlings germinated in the presence of both 1-MCP and ethylene displayed increases in root penetration with increasing ethylene concentration, indicating that ethylene could counteract the 1-MCP-induced inhibition of root penetration. This agrees with previous reports that exogenously applied ethylene can partially restore the 1-MCP-induced inhibition of ethylene receptors in some plant species (Sisler et al, 1996;Binder and Bleecker, 2003;Feng et al, 2004;Sisler, 2006). Taken together, these observations strongly support a role of ethylene in regulating root penetration.…”
Section: Inhibition Of Ethylene Signaling Impairs Root Penetration Insupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1D shows that seedlings germinated in the presence of both 1-MCP and ethylene displayed increases in root penetration with increasing ethylene concentration, indicating that ethylene could counteract the 1-MCP-induced inhibition of root penetration. This agrees with previous reports that exogenously applied ethylene can partially restore the 1-MCP-induced inhibition of ethylene receptors in some plant species (Sisler et al, 1996;Binder and Bleecker, 2003;Feng et al, 2004;Sisler, 2006). Taken together, these observations strongly support a role of ethylene in regulating root penetration.…”
Section: Inhibition Of Ethylene Signaling Impairs Root Penetration Insupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To study the role of ethylene in root growth in tomato, we germinated tomato seeds on Soilrite in the presence of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), an inhibitor of ethylene receptors (Sisler et al, 1996;Sisler, 2006). Amazingly, in contrast to control seedlings, which showed normal penetration, the roots of the 1-MCP-treated seedlings failed to penetrate into the Soilrite and grew in the air, forming loops (Fig.…”
Section: Inhibition Of Ethylene Signaling Impairs Root Penetration Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethylene gas (1 L/L) treatment also induced a similar level of root hairs in the rhd6 root, as did 5 M ACC (data not shown), and the effect of exogenous ethylene or ACC could be blocked completely by 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), the competitive inhibitor of ethylene binding to the receptors. We chose 1-MCP as an antagonist of ethylene action because of its high specificity of action and lack of deleterious side effects (Sisler et al, 1996;Hall et al, 2000). At 1 L/L, 1-MCP almost completely abolished ACC-induced root hair formation and the expression of AtEXP7 and AtEXP18 in rhd6 (Figure 4).…”
Section: Exogenous Ethylene Is a Positive Effector For The Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fruit harvested at stage 0 that did not receive 1-MCP application presented ideal consumption conditions after five days of ripening (Figure 1). Even 1-MCP binding with the receptor in an irreversible way, fruit can reassume its ripening once new receptors are formed (SISLER et al, 1996). Probably, few molecules of receptor were formed or activated in fruit harvested at stage 0 at the application time, and, for that reason, 1-MCP could block a high percentage of receptor sites, prejudicing the receptor turnover and consecutively the ripening reassuming.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%