2017
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.21040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of 2 Years of Treatment With Sublingual Grass Pollen Immunotherapy on Nasal Response to Allergen Challenge at 3 Years Among Patients With Moderate to Severe Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Sublingual immunotherapy and subcutaneous immunotherapy are effective in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Three years of continuous treatment with subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy has been shown to improve symptoms for at least 2 years following discontinuation of treatment. OBJECTIVE To assess whether 2 years of treatment with grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy, compared with placebo, provides improved nasal response to allergen challenge at 3-year follow-up. DESIGN, SETTING, A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
194
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
194
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Around 30 patients per treatment arm finished the study, and while SCIT‐treated patients had significantly reduced nasal symptoms scores in year 1 and year 2 of treatment, SLIT treatment only achieved this in year 2 of treatment. After treatment discontinuation, SLIT was not effective in reducing nasal symptoms scores, underscoring the need for prolonged treatment periods or optimized allergen vaccines for SLIT application . Interestingly, spIgG4 responses were stronger and showed faster kinetics in SCIT treatment compared to SLIT, while SLIT but not SCIT induced an increased spIgE titres, indicating that the ratio of spIgG over IgE was much higher in SCIT compared to SLIT, which was also reflected in the early allergic skin response upon allergen challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Around 30 patients per treatment arm finished the study, and while SCIT‐treated patients had significantly reduced nasal symptoms scores in year 1 and year 2 of treatment, SLIT treatment only achieved this in year 2 of treatment. After treatment discontinuation, SLIT was not effective in reducing nasal symptoms scores, underscoring the need for prolonged treatment periods or optimized allergen vaccines for SLIT application . Interestingly, spIgG4 responses were stronger and showed faster kinetics in SCIT treatment compared to SLIT, while SLIT but not SCIT induced an increased spIgE titres, indicating that the ratio of spIgG over IgE was much higher in SCIT compared to SLIT, which was also reflected in the early allergic skin response upon allergen challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Allergen‐specific CD45RB low CD27 − CRTH2 + CD161 + CD49d + T cells (Th2A) are more frequent in allergic patients compared to nonallergic individuals and suggesting a role for the control of clinical allergic reactions by these cells that are induced by immunotherapy . Also in long‐term grass‐specific immunotherapy, a clinical improvement during 2 years of treatment has been associated with the decrease in numbers of the allergen‐specific CRTH2 + CCR4 + CD27 − CD4 + Th2 cells . Indeed, there are now many studies confirming the role of decreased Th2 responses in the control of allergic disease and Treg cells play an essential role in the suppression of Th2 cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…83 In a recent study, either SCIT or SLIT tablets were effective compared to placebo over 2 years, but 2 years were insufficient for long-term efficacy as measured 1 year off treatment. 65 In another adult study, participants randomized to 3 years of ragweed continued to benefit after 2 years post-SCIT. 178 Similarly, children randomized to 3 or 5 years HDM SCIT had similar outcomes at 5 years.…”
Section: How Long Ait Sh Ould Be Contin Ued For In Ar?mentioning
confidence: 99%