1994
DOI: 10.2514/3.26566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a baffle on slosh waves excited by gravity-gradient acceleration in microgravity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analyses are performed for both ground-based and microgravity applications and are mainly based on the Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) approach as embodied by the Los Alamos code RIPPLE and its derivatives (Kothe, Mjolsness & Torrey 1991). Investigations in this category have focused on: the evolution of the free surface as influenced by the microgravity environment (Liu 1994), the reorienting of the vapour subject to spacecraft thrust (Hung & Shyu 1992), the free surface deformation as affected by the jet flow and geysers (Kothe et al 1991;Thornton & Hochstein 2001) or by external forces such as magnetic fields (Marchetta & Hochstein 2000;Marchetta, Hochstein & Sauter 2001) and fluid slosh coupled to gravity-gradient accelerations or spacecraft dynamics (Peterson, Crawley & Hansman 1989;Hung & Lee 1994). The studies in this category are all limited to isothermal models, and, again, divulge no information with regard to tank pressurization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses are performed for both ground-based and microgravity applications and are mainly based on the Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) approach as embodied by the Los Alamos code RIPPLE and its derivatives (Kothe, Mjolsness & Torrey 1991). Investigations in this category have focused on: the evolution of the free surface as influenced by the microgravity environment (Liu 1994), the reorienting of the vapour subject to spacecraft thrust (Hung & Shyu 1992), the free surface deformation as affected by the jet flow and geysers (Kothe et al 1991;Thornton & Hochstein 2001) or by external forces such as magnetic fields (Marchetta & Hochstein 2000;Marchetta, Hochstein & Sauter 2001) and fluid slosh coupled to gravity-gradient accelerations or spacecraft dynamics (Peterson, Crawley & Hansman 1989;Hung & Lee 1994). The studies in this category are all limited to isothermal models, and, again, divulge no information with regard to tank pressurization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments could be classified into two categories: those where phase change was present and those where it was absent. In the latter category, investigations were typically concerned with slosh dynamics, 8,9 or mixing characteristics/flow profiles in the liquid. [10][11][12] The other category of experiments studied self-pressurization 13 and different pressure control strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Investigations in this category have focused on: evolution of the free surface as influenced by the microgravity environment, 18 reorientation of the vapor subject to spacecraft thrust, 19 free surface deformation as affected by the jet flow and geysers 17,20 or by external forces, such as magnetic fields 21,22 and fluid slosh coupled to gravity-gradient accelerations or spacecraft dynamics. 23,24 The studies in this category are all limited to isothermal models, and, again, divulge no information with respect to tank pressurization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%