2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00104.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a Boron Nitride Interphase That Debonds between the Interphase and the Matrix in SiC/SiC Composites

Abstract: Typically, the debonding and sliding interface enabling fiber pullout for SiC‐fiber‐reinforced SiC‐matrix composites with BN‐based interphases occurs between the fiber and the interphase. Recently, composites have been fabricated where interface debonding and sliding occur between the BN interphase and the matrix. This results in two major improvements in mechanical properties. First, significantly higher failure strains were attained due to the lower interfacial shear strength with no loss in ultimate strengt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3)) and both interfacial shear stress and tensile stress were high. At lower fiber speed, crack deflection occurred at fiber surface (as a result of some surface crystallization) whereas for higher fiber speed it was observed at the SiC m /BN interface, these two scenarios corresponding to the “inside” and “outside” debonding reported by Morscher et al , 43 in related experiments. In the case of “outside” debonding, both the interfacial shear stress and tensile failure stress were lower but the lifetime in tensile static fatigue at 700°C in dry or wet air was dramatically improved (crack deflection occurring far from fiber surface) 42 …”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…3)) and both interfacial shear stress and tensile stress were high. At lower fiber speed, crack deflection occurred at fiber surface (as a result of some surface crystallization) whereas for higher fiber speed it was observed at the SiC m /BN interface, these two scenarios corresponding to the “inside” and “outside” debonding reported by Morscher et al , 43 in related experiments. In the case of “outside” debonding, both the interfacial shear stress and tensile failure stress were lower but the lifetime in tensile static fatigue at 700°C in dry or wet air was dramatically improved (crack deflection occurring far from fiber surface) 42 …”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The microscopy results shown here indicate that the iBN‐Sylramic fibers are more oxidation resistant than the Hi‐Nicalon Type S, and Sylramic fibers as long as the in situ BN layer remains in contact with the fiber. This greater oxidation resistance is manifest in the improved stress‐rupture properties observed for iBN‐Sylramic‐containing composites after testing at 1088 K in air . These stress‐rupture test conditions are less aggressive than the HPBR, however, and once the onset of BN oxidation occurs, borosilicate glass formation leads to rapid and significant degradation of the oxidation resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this concern, NASA developed CMC thermal treatment processes that would allow the BN coating to shrink toward the fiber surface and debond from the matrix, thereby ensuring crack deflection to occur on the outside of the fiber-protective BN coating [29]. To address this concern, NASA developed CMC thermal treatment processes that would allow the BN coating to shrink toward the fiber surface and debond from the matrix, thereby ensuring crack deflection to occur on the outside of the fiber-protective BN coating [29].…”
Section: Advances In Interfacial Fiber Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%