Effect of a Community Health Worker–Led Multicomponent Intervention on Blood Pressure Control in Low-Income Patients in Argentina

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Despite extensive knowledge of hypertension treatment, the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension is high and increasing in low-and middle-income countries.OBJECTIVE To test whether a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention would improve blood pressure (BP) control among low-income patients with hypertension.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cluster randomized trial was conducted in 18 centers for primary health care within a national public system providing free medications and health care to uninsured patients in Argentina. A total of 1432 low-income adult patients with uncontrolled hypertension were recruited between June 2013 and April 2015 and followed up to October 2016.INTERVENTIONS Nine centers (743 patients) were randomized to the multicomponent intervention, which included a community health worker-led home intervention (health coaching, home BP monitoring, and BP audit and feedback), a physician intervention, and a text-messaging intervention over 18 months. Nine centers (689 patients) were randomized to usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe coprimary outcomes were the differences in systolic and diastolic BP changes from baseline to the end of follow-up of patients with hypertension. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with controlled hypertension (BP <140/90 mm Hg). Three BP measurements were obtained at each of 2 baseline and 2 termination visits using a standard protocol, the means of which were used for analyses. RESULTSOf 1432 participants (mean age, 55.8 years [SD, 13.3]; 772 women [53.0%]), 1357 (94.8%) completed the trial. Baseline mean systolic BP was 151.7 mm Hg for the intervention group and 149.8 mm Hg for the usual care group; the mean diastolic BP was 92.2 mm Hg for the intervention group and 90.1 mm Hg for the usual care group. Systolic BP reduction from baseline to month 18 was 19.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 17.9-20.8 mm Hg) for the intervention group and 12.7 mm Hg (95% CI, 11.3-14.2 mm Hg) for the usual care group; the difference in the reduction was 6.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.6-8.6; P < .001). Diastolic BP decreased by 12.2 mm Hg (95% CI, 11.2-13.2 mm Hg) in the intervention group and 6.9 mm Hg (95% CI, 5.9-7.8 mm Hg) in the control group; the difference in the reduction was 5.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.0-6.8 mm Hg; P < .001). The proportion of patients with controlled hypertension increased from 17.0% at baseline to 72.9% at 18 months in the intervention group and from 17.6% to 52.2% in the usual care group; the difference in the increase was 20.6% (95% CI, 15.4%-25.9%; P < .001). No adverse events were reported.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Low-income patients in Argentina with uncontrolled hypertension who participated in a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention experienced a greater decrease in systolic and diastolic BP than did patients who received usual care over 18 months. Further research is needed to assess generalizability and cost-effectiveness of this intervention and to understand which components may have contributed most to th...

Women's and healthcare providers’ perceptions of long‐term complications associated with hypertension and diabetes in pregnancy: a qualitative study

“…Home-based BP monitoring by CHWs has been shown to be feasible and effective in several studies, both within and outside the context of pregnancy. [39][40][41][42][43] With the correct support and supervision, task-sharing postpartum care with CHWs may help address the significant workforce shortages affecting specialist obstetricians in rural India.…”

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the community-based management of hypertension in Nepal study (COBIN): a retrospective analysis

“…Interestingly, the secondary model of building on the existing maternal and child health programme would not generate substantial savings, because reductions in In Argentina, a programme involving 60-90 min monthly to bimonthly lifestyle counselling sessions over 18 months reduced systolic blood pressure by a mean of 6·6 mm Hg (95% CI 4·6-8·6) more among those with uncontrolled hypertension in the intervention group compared with those in the control group, at a cost of US$103 per participant. 10 A less intensive intervention in Pakistan providing quarterly home visits to people with hypertension had a cost of US$3·34 per participant, and produced a mean systolic blood pressure reduction of 5·6 mm Hg (95% CI 3·7-7·4). 8,25 Our programme also targeted people who are normotensive and prehypertensive with a view towards prevention and used existing community health workers (ie, FCHVs).…”

“…7 However, advocating for increased investment in hypertension prevention and control requires evidence-based solutions generated in a local context. [8][9][10][11] We recently reported the results of the community-based management of hypertension in Nepal (COBIN) cluster randomised controlled trial, a 12-month community-based blood pressure monitoring and life style counselling intervention undertaken by female community health volunteers (FCHVs), against usual care. 12 FCHVs typically focus on promoting safe maternal and child health, and family planning.…”

Hypertension control in Argentina, in the middle of a long road

“…Recently, the results of a randomized clinical study on the multicomponent intervention effects on BP control in low‐income hypertensive patients were published . The study was conducted during 18 months in patients who were assisted in Primary Health Care Centers (PHCC).…”

“…Recently, the results of a randomized clinical study on the multicomponent intervention effects on BP control in low-income hypertensive patients were published. 16 The study was conducted during 18 months in patients who were assisted in Primary Health Care Centers (PHCC). The intervention was applied to hypertensive patients assisted in nine PHCC, and hypertensive patients treated in a usual way in other nine PHCC were taken as a control group.…”