2002
DOI: 10.1518/0018720024494874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a Concurrent Auditory Task on Visual Search Performance in a Driving-Related Image-Flicker Task

Abstract: The effect of a concurrent auditory task on visual search was investigated using an image-flicker technique. Participants were undergraduate university students with normal or corrected-to-normal vision who searched for changes in images of driving scenes that involved either driving-related (e.g., traffic light) or driving-unrelated (e.g., mailbox) scene elements. The results indicated that response times were significantly slower if the search was accompanied by a concurrent auditory task. In addition, slowe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the safety-relevant changes were detected more reliably than were the safety-irrelevant changes, cognitive load uniformly diminished the detection of both types of changes. This finding concurs with that of Richard et al (2002), who observed that performing a nondriving secondary task impaired drivers' ability to detect driving-relevant and driving-irrelevant changes to a similar degree. The decreased confidence in detecting changes suggests that participants were aware that the cognitive load of the auditory task and the blanking both diminished their performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Even though the safety-relevant changes were detected more reliably than were the safety-irrelevant changes, cognitive load uniformly diminished the detection of both types of changes. This finding concurs with that of Richard et al (2002), who observed that performing a nondriving secondary task impaired drivers' ability to detect driving-relevant and driving-irrelevant changes to a similar degree. The decreased confidence in detecting changes suggests that participants were aware that the cognitive load of the auditory task and the blanking both diminished their performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Trimmel and Poelzl [19] found that background noise lengthened RT by inhibiting parts of the cerebral cortex. Richard et al [14] and Lee et al [12] found that college students given a simulated driving task had longer RT when given a simultaneous auditory task. Redfern et al [13] found that subjects strapped to a platform that periodically changed orientation had slower RT before and during platform movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richards et al report using a laboratory-based image-flicker task to determine that response times to search for change in images of driving scenes were significantly slower in the presence of a concurrent auditory task (20). In addition, results of simulator-based studies have indicated that driving performance is affected when participants must respond to a secondary task (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%