2019
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30246-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a fluid bolus on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation (PrePARE): a randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the only reported trial to examine administration of a pre-intubation fluid bolus, the PrePARE (Preventing cardiovascular collaPse with Administration of fluid Resuscitation before Endotracheal intubation) trial, reported that a pre-intubation fluid bolus had no effect on the overall rate of cardiovascular collapse. 8 The receipt of positive pressure ventilation, however, appeared to modify the effect of a fluid bolus administration on cardiovascular collapse in the PrePARE trial. Patients receiving positive pressure ventilation appeared to have a lower rate cardiovascular collapse in the fluid bolus group compared with the no fluid bolus group, both among patients receiving non-invasive ventilation for pre-oxygenation (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.09; p value for interaction =0.032) and among patients receiving bag-mask ventilation between induction and laryngoscopy (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.13; p value for interaction =0.008).…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the only reported trial to examine administration of a pre-intubation fluid bolus, the PrePARE (Preventing cardiovascular collaPse with Administration of fluid Resuscitation before Endotracheal intubation) trial, reported that a pre-intubation fluid bolus had no effect on the overall rate of cardiovascular collapse. 8 The receipt of positive pressure ventilation, however, appeared to modify the effect of a fluid bolus administration on cardiovascular collapse in the PrePARE trial. Patients receiving positive pressure ventilation appeared to have a lower rate cardiovascular collapse in the fluid bolus group compared with the no fluid bolus group, both among patients receiving non-invasive ventilation for pre-oxygenation (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.09; p value for interaction =0.032) and among patients receiving bag-mask ventilation between induction and laryngoscopy (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.13; p value for interaction =0.008).…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients receiving positive pressure ventilation appeared to have a lower rate cardiovascular collapse in the fluid bolus group compared with the no fluid bolus group, both among patients receiving non-invasive ventilation for pre-oxygenation (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.09; p value for interaction =0.032) and among patients receiving bag-mask ventilation between induction and laryngoscopy (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.13; p value for interaction =0.008). 8 Provision of positive pressure ventilation with a bagmask device between induction and laryngoscopy has been shown to decrease the incidence of severe hypoxaemia during tracheal intubation of intensive care unit (ICU) patients (relative risk, 0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.77). 11 These results, and others examining use of non-invasive ventilation for pre-oxygenation during ICU intubations, 12 suggest that positive pressure ventilation should be provided during tracheal intubation for most critically ill patients.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent ESICM taskforce on fluid administration in circulatory dysfunction considered clinical signs of hypoperfusion important in the assessment of both the indication for and efficacy of a fluid challenge [10]. A cautious approach to fluid administration in absence of signs of cardiovascular collapse was supported by the findings of the Pre-PARE trial where 337 critically ill patients requiring tracheal intubation were randomly assigned to either a prophylactic fluid bolus or no fluid bolus [11]. The trial was stopped early for futility as there were no apparent differences in the rates of cardiovascular collapse upon induction between the two groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%