2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a Motivational Interviewing–Based Intervention on Initiation of Mental Health Treatment and Mental Health After an Emergency Department Visit Among Suicidal Adolescents

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Emergency department (ED) visits present opportunities to identify and refer suicidal youth for outpatient mental health care, although this practice is not routine.OBJECTIVE To examine whether a motivational interviewing-based intervention increases linkage of adolescents to outpatient mental health services and reduces depression symptoms and suicidal ideation in adolescents seeking emergency care for non-mental health-related concerns who screen positive for suicide risk. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PAR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
54
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While there was no statistically significant difference in using mental health services at 2-month follow-up, the MI group began receiving most psychiatric treatments and regularly attending therapeutic sessions at 6-month follow-up. [ 32 ] The reason the intervention did not produce the desired outcome after 2 months, unlike what happened in the present study, could be that – as the parents of these adolescents stated – many participants were unable to access mental health services because of logistical barriers, scheduling problems, and long waiting lists. Conversely, in the present study, arrangements were made for participants willing to use mental health services to refer to a psychiatrist or counselor.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…While there was no statistically significant difference in using mental health services at 2-month follow-up, the MI group began receiving most psychiatric treatments and regularly attending therapeutic sessions at 6-month follow-up. [ 32 ] The reason the intervention did not produce the desired outcome after 2 months, unlike what happened in the present study, could be that – as the parents of these adolescents stated – many participants were unable to access mental health services because of logistical barriers, scheduling problems, and long waiting lists. Conversely, in the present study, arrangements were made for participants willing to use mental health services to refer to a psychiatrist or counselor.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Suppose that this youth does not need hospital admission but does need community care. Unfortunately, a substantial proportion of community referrals do not result in completed treatment [9]. Finally, assuming that the hospital has screened a youth, detected the risk of a suicide attempt, and arranged to deliver a mental health treatment, and the youth attends the appointment, then that treatment has to work to prevent a suicide attempt.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 3 month follow-up however, it appears the intervention group had two more patients with suicide attempts compared to the control group. Four more patients in the intervention group were hospitalized compared to controls ( Grupp-Phelan et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Current and Future Strategies For Prevention Intervention mentioning
confidence: 99%