1986
DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12284203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a New Topically Active Antiandrogen (RU38882) on the Rat Sebaceous Gland: Comparison with Cyproterone Acetate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained when these compounds were tested locally on one hamster flank organ. Compound 77 reduced flank organ weight by 80% while under these conditions, compound 77 was more potent when compared to cyproterone acetate [102]. In another class of des-A-steroids, Ro 5-2537 showed weak antiandrogenic activity and no androgenic activity under the assay conditions used.…”
Section: Syntheticmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similar results were obtained when these compounds were tested locally on one hamster flank organ. Compound 77 reduced flank organ weight by 80% while under these conditions, compound 77 was more potent when compared to cyproterone acetate [102]. In another class of des-A-steroids, Ro 5-2537 showed weak antiandrogenic activity and no androgenic activity under the assay conditions used.…”
Section: Syntheticmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In fact, CPA effects on sebum formation are not yet described at the molecular level. Early reports comparing CPA to other antiandrogens (32,33) have been followed by the study demonstrating CPA induced enzyme inhibition in the sebocyte line SZ95 (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, CPA and spironolactone did not inhibit 5 -reductase activity or testosterone metabolism in SZ95 sebocytes or HaCaT keratinocytes in vitro . Similarly, studies by Bouton et al [33] and Battmann et al [34] on the non-steroidal anti-androgens inocoterone acetate or RU58841, respectively, did not show an effect on 5 -reductase and / or testosterone metabolism. We conclude, therefore, that any effect of these compounds on the biological activity of the investigated cells is not due to an interaction with enzymes of peripheral testosterone metabolism within the cells but due to binding to the androgen receptor [35] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%