1982
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400030039x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a Nitrification Inhibitor on the K, Ca, and Mg Composition of Winter Wheat Forage1

Abstract: Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important forage for cattle in much of the Southern Great Plains. However, death losses in wheat pastures due to grass tetany of nursing and pregnant older cattle, and frothy bloat of younger cattle, often occur. Forages from fields moderately or heavily fertilized with N are generally more hazardous than forages from unfertilized fields. As regards grass tetany, high rates of N fertilization are particularly hazardous when soil K is high. The objective of the present … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major difference in N fertilizer sources relating to grass tetany appears to be the relative amounts of NI-l~4 -and NO 3 -N in the fertilizers. Studies with wheat grown in nutrient solutions (Cox and Reisenauer, 1977) and with wheat in soil in the greenhouse (Mathers et al, 1982) showed that NO 3 -N stimulated Mg uptake and increased the concentration of Mg more than did NH~ -N. A study in Louisiana (Table 2) showed similar results with ryegrass in the field (Robinson et al, 1987). Nitrogen fertilizers were applied in multiple applications, at planting in October and after each harvest throughout the growing season.…”
Section: Liming and Fertilization Practicesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The major difference in N fertilizer sources relating to grass tetany appears to be the relative amounts of NI-l~4 -and NO 3 -N in the fertilizers. Studies with wheat grown in nutrient solutions (Cox and Reisenauer, 1977) and with wheat in soil in the greenhouse (Mathers et al, 1982) showed that NO 3 -N stimulated Mg uptake and increased the concentration of Mg more than did NH~ -N. A study in Louisiana (Table 2) showed similar results with ryegrass in the field (Robinson et al, 1987). Nitrogen fertilizers were applied in multiple applications, at planting in October and after each harvest throughout the growing season.…”
Section: Liming and Fertilization Practicesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The decreased growth resulting from urea fertilization would explain the increases in leaf Ρ, Κ, and Mn concentrations. In addition, NH4 + -N uptake from urea would be expected to increase Ρ concentration (14,15,16) and reduce concentrations of Ca, Mg, and Κ (14,16,17). The inhibitory effect of NH4 + -N uptake on Κ concentrations was diminished by reductions in growth.…”
Section: Nutrient Concentrations and Uptake Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the Ratio of (K/Ca + Mg) in forage has a special significance. A ratio of more than 2.2 is considered hazardous and might cause grass tetany (Mathers et al, 1989), the maize in the first stages used forage for animal.…”
Section: Cations and Anions Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%