Effect of a Novel Pocket Compression Device on Hematomas Following Cardiac Electronic Device Implantation in Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Abstract

BackgroundA pocket hematoma is a well-recognized complication that occurs after pacemaker or defibrillator implantation. It is associated with increased pocket infection and hospital stay. Patients suffering from atrial fibrillation and undergoing cardiovascular electronic implantable device (CIED) surgery are widely prescribed and treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). In this study, the use of a novel compression device was evaluated to examine its ability to decrease the incidence of pocket hematomas following device implantation with uninterrupted DOACs.MethodsA total of 204 participants who received DOACs and underwent CIED implantation were randomized into an experimental group (novel compression device) and a control group (elastic adhesive tape with a sandbag). The primary outcome was pocket hematoma, and the secondary outcomes were skin erosions and patient comfort score. Grade 3 hematoma was defined as a hematoma that required anticoagulation therapy interruption, re-operation, or prolonged hospital stay.ResultsThe baseline characteristics of both groups had no significant differences. The incidence of grades 1 and 2 hematomas was significantly lower in the compression device group than in the conventional pressure dressing group (7.8 vs. 23.5 and 2.0 vs. 5.9%, respectively; P < 0.01). Grade 3 hematoma occurred in 2 of 102 patients in the experimental group and 7 of 102 patients in the control group (2.0 vs. 6.9%; P = 0.03). The incidence rates of skin erosion were significantly lower, and the patient comfort score was much higher in the compression device group than in the control group (P < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the use of novel compression device was a significant protective factor for pocket hematoma (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.29–0.69, P = 0.01).ConclusionsThe incidence of pocket hematomas and skin erosions significantly decreases when the proposed compression device is used for patients undergoing device implantation with uninterrupted DOACs. Thus, the length of hospital stay and re-operation rate can be reduced, and patient comfort can be improved.Clinical Trial Registrationhttp://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2100049430.

Factors of mortality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device: 5-year experience

“…Our research demonstrated that mortality rates were higher among NOAC and P2Y12 inhibitor users. The fact that P2Y12 inhibitors are more potent agents than ASA and the difficulty in finding the antidote for NOACs may have caused an increase in all-cause mortality 14 . Cardiac conditions commonly co-occur with chronic diseases.…”

Infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and preventive measures

“…Mechanical compression devices have also been designed to be applied after wound closure. Some of these devices have demonstrated benefit in reducing postoperative hematoma [94][95][96]. Pressure dressings may be used for 24 hours although their efficacy has not been demonstrated.…”