Effect of a pre-paid incentive on response rates to an Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Web-Mail survey

Suzer‐Gurtekin, Z. Tuba; Elkasabi, Mahmoud; Liu, Mingnan; Lepkowski, James M.; Curtin, Richard T.; McBee, Rebecca

doi:10.29115/sp-2016-0025

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A mail-only survey by Suzer-Gurtekin et al (2016) achieved a response rate of 30%. Thus, the response rate in this study was expected to be approximately 30%.…”

Section: Response Ratementioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate social responsibility initiatives of banks and customers’ selection of banks in Hong Kong

Ha,

Wong,

Loh

2024

JABES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study examines whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives positively impact customers’ selection of retail banks in Hong Kong (HK) and identifies which CSR domains affect customers’ selection of banks.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted a quantitative approach. Primary data were collected from 416 customers of 22 retail banks in HK. The theoretical framework of this study was developed from a literature review, prior studies by Oberseder et al. (2013 and 2014), and CSR initiatives implemented by leading retail banks in HK. Descriptive statistics and statistical tests were used to analyze the data.FindingsThe study found that CSR initiatives positively affect customers’ bank selection. CSR initiatives related to the customer and environment domains are likely to have a greater impact on customers than those related to the society domain and are not likely to significantly impact customers’ bank selection.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the CSR literature by offering enhanced insight into the dynamics of CSR and its effects on customer bank selection. Furthermore, this study tests consumers’ perceptions of CSR initiatives in each CSR domain in the banking sector in Hong Kong – a novel approach that has not been previously explored in existing studies. These findings can help banks review the effectiveness of their CSR initiatives and make informed decisions on which initiatives should pursue improved CSR performance and efficient resource allocation.

show abstract

“…A mail-only survey by Suzer-Gurtekin et al (2016) achieved a response rate of 30%. Thus, the response rate in this study was expected to be approximately 30%.…”

Section: Response Ratementioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate social responsibility initiatives of banks and customers’ selection of banks in Hong Kong

Ha,

Wong,

Loh

2024

JABES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, several studies show based on multivariate regressions that persons with comparatively low socio-economic resources can be mobilized through cash incentives (Becker et al, 2019;Göritz, 2008;Göritz & Luthe, 2013;Schröder et al, 2013) and lotteries (Göritz & Luthe, 2013). Other studies, however, find no statistically significant demographic differences between various incentive groups (Becker & Mehlkop, 2011;Suzer-Gurtekin et al, 2016). Gajic et al (2012), for example, do not find statistically significant differences in characteristics like gender, education, or household income in mean comparisons.…”

Section: Background and Conceptual Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Participation in Probability-Based Online Panels: Two Incentive Experiments and Their Effects on Response and Panel Recruitment

Witte

Schaurer²,

Schröder

et al. 2022

Social Science Computer Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article investigates how mail-based online panel recruitment can be facilitated through incentives. The analysis relies on two incentive experiments and their effects on panel recruitment, and the intermediate participation in the recruitment survey. The experiments were implemented in the context of the German Emigration and Remigration Panel Study and encompass two samples of randomly sampled persons. Tested incentives include a conditional lottery, conditional monetary incentives, and the combination of unconditional money-in-hand with conditional monetary incentives. For an encompassing evaluation of the link between incentives and panel recruitment, the article further assesses the incentives’ implications for demographic composition and panel recruitment unit costs. Multivariate analysis indicates that low combined incentives (€5/€5) or, where unconditional disbursement is unfeasible, high conditional incentives (€20) are most effective in enhancing panel participation. In terms of demographic bias, low combined incentives (€5/€5) and €10 conditional incentives are the favored options. The budget options from the perspective of panel recruitment include the lottery and the €10 conditional incentive which break-even at net sample sizes of 1000.

show abstract

“…A University of Michigan series of experiments in increasing web-mailed survey completion rates between 2011 and 2012 found "fresh" first-time requests to do an online survey saw 17.4% completed compared with 34.5% when offered a US$5 incentive. Recontacting people saw 50.3% respond with no incentive, rising to 70.1% with an incentive (Suzer-Gurtekin, McBee et al 2016).…”

Section: Low Response Rates In Cross-sectional Surveysmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quit Smoking Weapons of Mass Distraction

Chapman¹

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ISBN 9781743328538 paperback ISBN 9781743328545 epub ISBN 9781743328590 pdf Contents xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations xv Introduction 1 1 How do most people quit other addictions? 12 2 How we study quitting smoking: a critical look 56 3 Quitting unassisted: before and after "evidence-based" methods 79 4 The modest impact of most popular interventions 5 "Don't try to quit cold turkey" 6 Vaping to quit: the latest mass distraction 7 Insights from qualitative research with unassisted quitters 8 Strategies for reducing smoking across populations 9 Controlling tobacco supply and the endgame References Index ixIt is over 45 years since I first became engaged with questions about how best to reduce tobacco use across populations and the diseases that this causes. Across this time I have met, often worked with and become close friends with many of the best minds in international tobacco control. Seventeen years of that time were spent being deputy editor (1992-97) and then editor (1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008) of Tobacco Control, the world's first research journal entirely dedicated to reducing tobacco use and the diseases it causes. During those years, it was a rare day when I was not reading and editing one or more of the thousands of papers that were submitted to the journal, even on Christmas Day. There are very few long-term researchers active across the many disciplinary and sub-topic fields of tobacco control whose most important work I've not read.Trying to list and thank everyone who has ever influenced my thinking about tobacco control is an almost boundless task. But the following people are those to whom across different times -including during the writing of this book -I owe a huge collective debt in many ways:

show abstract

Effect of a pre-paid incentive on response rates to an Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Web-Mail survey

Cited by 6 publications

References 5 publications

Corporate social responsibility initiatives of banks and customers’ selection of banks in Hong Kong

Corporate social responsibility initiatives of banks and customers’ selection of banks in Hong Kong

Enhancing Participation in Probability-Based Online Panels: Two Incentive Experiments and Their Effects on Response and Panel Recruitment

Quit Smoking Weapons of Mass Distraction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About