The effect on helix stability of placing a single pair of His-Asp or Asp-His residues, spaced (i, i + 3), (i, i + 4), or (i, i + 5), in an alanine-based peptide has been determined. The peptides have identical amino acid compositions, intrinsic helix propensities, and closely similar charge-helix dipole interactions, but they have different side chain interactions. Their helix contents are measured by circular dichroism over the pH range of 2-9, and the strength of a particular side chain interaction is determined from the increase in helix content over the reference peptide with the (i, i + 5) spacing. Side chain interactions are found for both the (i, i + 3) and (i, i + 4) spacings but only in the His-Asp orientation. Charged hydrogen-bond interactions occur at extreme pH values, and they are almost as strong as the ion-pair interactions at pH 5.5; but only the (i, i + 4) His-Asp peptide forms a strong hydrogen bond at pH 2, and only the (i, i + 3) peptide forms a strong hydrogen bond at pH 8.5. The ion-pair interactions are not screened effectively by 1 M NaCl, and hydrogen bonds probably acount for most of their strength.Whether ion-pair interactions contribute favorably to protein stability is still under discussion. Although a HisAsp salt bridge (the term salt bridge is used here to denote a H-bonded ion pair) contributes -3 to -5 kcal/mol, or about one-half of the net stability of T4 lysozyme (Anderson et al., 1990), nevertheless, attempts to increase the stability of T4 lysozyme by making engineered His-Asp ion-pair interactions were unsuccessful . Theoretical considerations suggest that the desolvation associated with burial or partial burial of charged groups should be unfavorable (Hendsch & Tidor, 1994; Honig & Nicholls, 1995) and earlier studies suggest that ion-pair interactions in proteins are strong interactions only when the interacting groups are partly buried (Friend & Gurd, 1979;Matthew & Richards, 1982;States & Karplus, 1987). Replacing three buried charged residues of Arc repressor with nonpolar residues does give increased stability [Waldburger et al., 1995; see also Hendsch et al. (1996)]. The role of ion-pair interactions in stabilizing coiled-coil dimer helices is also controversial (Krylov et al., 1994;Lumb & Kim, 1996;Lavigne et al., 1996, and references therein). The structures of some proteins from extreme thermophiles show networks of ion-pair interactions, and there is considerable curiosity about the possible role of these interactions in stabilizing proteins at high temperatures [see review in Goldman (1995)].Consequently, it is interesting to determine how effective ion-pair interactions are in stabilizing solvent-exposed peptide helices. A Glu 2-Arg 10 ion-pair interaction proved to be one of the sources of the surprising stability of the C-peptide helix from the N-terminal end of ribonuclease A [see Fairman et al. (1990) and references therein]. Repeated blocks of Glu 4 Lys 4 induce helix formation in a peptide when, in a peptide of the same amino acid composition...