2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-009-0175-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a varying gravitational constant on the SN Ia Hubble diagram, AGN luminosity evolution, and X-ray source counts

Abstract: The impact of a cosmic time evolution of the gravitational constant on SN Ia luminosity and AGN/QSO luminosity functions is studied. The gravitational constant scales linearly with the Hubble parameter, its present-day variation beingĠ 0 /G 0 ≈ 1.9 × 10 −4 Gyr −1 , compatible with current bounds from lunar laser ranging. Distance moduli of Type Ia supernovae are fitted with a cosmic expansion factor derived from temperature variations of planetary paleoclimates, and a luminosity dependence on lookback time pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From white dwarf cooling, Garcia-Berro et al (2011) derive an upper bound and Corsico et al (2013) find a white dwarf pulsation limit of . Tomaschitz (2010) considers a gravitational constant scaling linearly with the Hubble parameter, and fits the SNIa Hubble diagram and AGN source counts, concluding that further observational constraints are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From white dwarf cooling, Garcia-Berro et al (2011) derive an upper bound and Corsico et al (2013) find a white dwarf pulsation limit of . Tomaschitz (2010) considers a gravitational constant scaling linearly with the Hubble parameter, and fits the SNIa Hubble diagram and AGN source counts, concluding that further observational constraints are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precise value of ratio (1.2), the geometric factor 1/(4π), is not really important in this context; if we replace the pion mass by the proton mass, m p /m π ≈ 6.723, or change the adopted value of the Hubble constant, H 0 ≈ 68.02 km s −1 Mpc −1 , this ratio remains moderate. The fact that G 0 cm 3 = 4π 2 H 0 if we choose the pion mass for m and the mentioned value for H 0 , is a remarkable coincidence if one considers which quantities and numbers are involved, but the reasoning in this article or in Tomaschitz (2005Tomaschitz ( , 2010 does not depend on this specific value of the Hubble constant; a variation of H 0 within five percent can readily be accommodated in the fits. By contrast, a deceleration parameter very close to but different from −1 is essential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…6 and 7. By contrast, the SN Ia Hubble diagram in Tomaschitz (2010) only requires a mild luminosity evolution (λ = 1) of nearly perfect standard candles, cf. Stritzinger et al (2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation