“…The weighted mean effect sizes ( d + ) are positive for differences that favor the intervention relative to the comparison group. k , number of interventions; CI, confidence interval; Q , homogeneity statistic; I 2 , consistency of the effect sizes.
a
Outliers were detected for hemoglobin A1c (Beena & Sreekumaran, 2013; Popli et al, 2014; Sharma et al, 2015), fasting blood glucose (Balaji & Thirumaran, 2015; Popli et al, 2014; Sharma et al, 2015; Vaishali et al, 2012), and post-prandial glucose (Sharma et al, 2015), total cholesterol (Agte & Tarwadi, 2004), high-density lipoprotein (Balaji & Thirumaran, 2015; Vaishali et al, 2012), systolic blood pressure (Kumar and Kalidasan, 2014a; Shantakumari et al, 2012), and waist-to-hip ratio (Balaji et al, 2011; Sri et al, 2014). The magnitude and direction of the weighted mean ES that included the outlier(s) was generally consistent with the above outcomes (hemoglobin A1c: d + = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.64, 1.47, k = 21; fasting blood glucose: d + = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.61, 1.19, k = 24; post-prandial glucose: d + = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.99, k = 15; total cholesterol: d + = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.38, 0.86, k = 19; high-density lipoprotein: d + = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.42, 1.10, k = 19; waist-to-hip ratio: d + = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.15, 0.51, k = 6).…”