2014
DOI: 10.9790/2402-08543841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of acidic and basic pretreatment of wild algal biomass on Cr (VI) biosorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it was clear that C. red decreased as concentration increased. This result was similar to those recorded in previous studies, in which pollutant removal decreased by increasing their concentrations [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. In contrast, M. blue was nearly constant for both membrane types, i.e., AF-U and AF-S, which indicates the high efficiency of these membranes for removal of higher concentrations of M. blue dye.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, it was clear that C. red decreased as concentration increased. This result was similar to those recorded in previous studies, in which pollutant removal decreased by increasing their concentrations [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. In contrast, M. blue was nearly constant for both membrane types, i.e., AF-U and AF-S, which indicates the high efficiency of these membranes for removal of higher concentrations of M. blue dye.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, many conventional methods were used for chromium removal: ion exchange, electrodialysis, ultrafiltration, chemical precipitation and reverse osmosis (Nataraj et al 2007;Rajput et al 2016;An et al 2017;Yan et al 2017;Zamri et al 2017). However, these technologies are very expensive, generate toxic non-ecofriendly waste material and are not effective at a low chromium concentration (Singh et al 2014). Alternatively, many researchers were directed to use several non-conventional methods such as biosorption for better and safe removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, for chromium removal by acid and alkali pre-treated algal cells, Singh et al (2014) have observed that all of the pre-treated samples showed similar trends of removal. A rapid chromium biosorption took place in the first 30 min, showing a rapid removal of 65% at 15 min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The oxygen-containing (-COOH, -OH) and (-NH 2 ) were the main functional groups related metal biosorption in Bacillus species (Liu et al 2019). Metal sorption capacity of biosorbent can be altered by pre-treatment, which could modify the surface characteristics either by removing or masking the groups or by exposing more metal-binding sites (Singh et al 2014). The acid or alkali treatment contributes to removing some leachable materials (organic compounds, carbonatebased materials) that could influence acid-base properties (Oliveira et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%