2017
DOI: 10.5333/kgfs.2017.37.4.332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Addition of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Quality of Rye Silage Harvested at Early Heading Stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Juráček et al (2018) showed a statistically significant (P <0.05) lower acidity of water extract using homofermentative and heterofermentative strains of LAB in grass silages. The decrease in pH in current experiment was also statistically significant, and these results were also confirmed by Choi et al (2015Choi et al ( , 2016Choi et al ( , 2017. Decrease tendency in pH (4.97 vs. 4.90) was also reported by Kim et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, Juráček et al (2018) showed a statistically significant (P <0.05) lower acidity of water extract using homofermentative and heterofermentative strains of LAB in grass silages. The decrease in pH in current experiment was also statistically significant, and these results were also confirmed by Choi et al (2015Choi et al ( , 2016Choi et al ( , 2017. Decrease tendency in pH (4.97 vs. 4.90) was also reported by Kim et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, Kim et al (2017), Lee et al (2018) and found a lower dry matter content compared to control silage after the ho LAB application. Consistent with Haag et al (2016), Choi et al (2015Choi et al ( , 2016Choi et al ( , 2017 and a statistically significant (P <0.05) higher concentration of lactic acid was recorded in silages with additive compared to untreated silage. There were not statistically significant (P >0.05) differences in the formic acid content.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%