1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(99)00030-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of addition time of a superplasticizer on cement adsorption and on concrete workability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By now all these 3 methods are the same particularly the first and the third methods which shows almost the same results but in M.2 after the dispersion process of cement particles a percentage of water, which seems do not engaged in reaction with cement entirely, remain as a free water resulting a higher fluidizing effect and consequently lower outflow time thus proving its superiority among the other methods. These findings also are in agreement with the results reported in previous studies [14,15] demonstrating the effectiveness of delayed addition time of SP to cement. Furthermore, it can be understood that the stepwise and delayed water addition is also an efficient method with respect to higher fluidity as studied in this research work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By now all these 3 methods are the same particularly the first and the third methods which shows almost the same results but in M.2 after the dispersion process of cement particles a percentage of water, which seems do not engaged in reaction with cement entirely, remain as a free water resulting a higher fluidizing effect and consequently lower outflow time thus proving its superiority among the other methods. These findings also are in agreement with the results reported in previous studies [14,15] demonstrating the effectiveness of delayed addition time of SP to cement. Furthermore, it can be understood that the stepwise and delayed water addition is also an efficient method with respect to higher fluidity as studied in this research work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It was found that the best fluidizing effect could be acquired after adding 70% of mixing water to the cementitious materials and mixing for 3 minutes followed by adding the optimum dosage of SP and mixing for at least 4 minutes, 6 minutes seems preferable based on visual assessment, and finally adding the remaining 30% of water and blending for an extra 6 minutes to reach a steady-state consistency. However, the findings of this paper confirm the efficiency of delayed SP addition method, reported in previous studies [14,15], they also demonstrate the effectiveness of delayed and stepwise water addition method as the main contribution of this paper. This provides the possibility of reducing the paste water content resulting in higher strength and durability or even, with the same w/c ratio, causes an improved workability or the possibility of increasing the aggregate content leading to a costeffective and eco-efficient UHPC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…KIMA B G et al [6] showed that the cement containing low amount of soluble alkali have a tendency to adsorb a high amount of superplasticizer, while the cements containing high amout of soluble alkali do not. CHIOCCHIO G et al [7] and HSU K C et al [8] found that The fluidity of portland cement pastes is greatly affected by the time of addition of the superplasticizers. When the addition of superplasticizer is delayed the workability is always found to be higher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%