1988
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1988.255.6.h1492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of adenosine and its analogues on calcium influx in coronary artery

Abstract: In the present study, we have investigated the changes in calcium influx during the relaxing responses to adenosine and its analogues. Calcium-45 influx was measured in bovine coronary artery rings in the presence of prostaglandin F2 alpha (10(-5) M) and KCl (50 and 100 mM). Prostaglandin F2 alpha and KCl caused increases in calcium influx. Prostaglandin F2 alpha produced a further contraction when added to rings maximally contracted with KCl (100 mM or higher), suggesting two different mechanisms for prostagl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, both dila zep and lidoflazine produced much less re laxing effect on the PGF2a-induced contrac tions compared with K+-induced contrac tions (tables I, II). This is further supported by the fact that we have recently shown that the influx of calcium induced by receptor activation was more sensitive to the inhibi tion by adenosine and its analogs than the calcium influx induced by membrane depo larization in coronary smooth muscle [22], The findings that the relaxation produced by dilazep, lidofiazine and diltiazem of K+ (50 mmol/l)-depolarized cerebral artery con tracted by 2.5 mmol/1 CaCl2 was unaffected by adenosine deaminase (data not shown), and that the relaxing effects of dilazep, lido fiazine and diltiazem in renal artery con tracted by PGF2a were also not affected by adenosine deaminase, suggest that the relax ations induced by these drugs were indepen dent of endogenous adenosine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…On the other hand, both dila zep and lidoflazine produced much less re laxing effect on the PGF2a-induced contrac tions compared with K+-induced contrac tions (tables I, II). This is further supported by the fact that we have recently shown that the influx of calcium induced by receptor activation was more sensitive to the inhibi tion by adenosine and its analogs than the calcium influx induced by membrane depo larization in coronary smooth muscle [22], The findings that the relaxation produced by dilazep, lidofiazine and diltiazem of K+ (50 mmol/l)-depolarized cerebral artery con tracted by 2.5 mmol/1 CaCl2 was unaffected by adenosine deaminase (data not shown), and that the relaxing effects of dilazep, lido fiazine and diltiazem in renal artery con tracted by PGF2a were also not affected by adenosine deaminase, suggest that the relax ations induced by these drugs were indepen dent of endogenous adenosine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Previous studies have shown that NECA has little effect on contractions dependent upon calcium in¯ux through voltageoperated calcium channels, for example by increasing K (Young & Merrill 1983;Urquhart & Broadley 1991). Furthermore, K -induced in¯ux of 45 Ca 2 in bovine coronary artery rings (Ramagopal & Mustafa 1988) and rabbit aorta (Zawadzki & Weiss 1990) was relatively resistant to inhibition by adenosine and NECA. NECA seems, therefore, to inhibit phenylephrine-induced contractions by preventing in¯ux of extracellular Ca 2 through the so-called receptor-operated calcium channels.…”
Section: Effects Of Neca On Contractions Dependent Upon Extracellularmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the current study, extracellular A 2B -adenosine receptor stimulation of the guinea-pig aorta was studied by use of both adenosine and 5 H -(N-ethylcarboxamido)adenosine (NECA), which is not a substrate for the purine transport system (Collis & Brown 1983) and does not, therefore, exert an intracellular action. Stimulation of A 2 -adenosine receptors is thought to evoke vasorelaxation by reducing the amount of calcium available for contraction (Young & Merrill 1983;Ramagopal & Mustafa 1988;Zawadzki & Weiss 1990), possibly by inhibition of membrane receptor-operated calcium channels (Collis & Brown 1983;Ramagopal & Mustafa 1988;Urquhart & Broadley 1991), resulting in reduced entry of extracellular calcium ions. Previous studies have shown that adenosine inhibits both intra-and extracellular Ca 2 mobilization in the relaxation of coronary arteries precontracted with PGF 2a , acetylcholine or noradrenaline (Ramagopal et al 1989;Ramagopal & Mustafa 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endothelium-derived NO thus partly mediates the vasodilator effects of adenosine. Adenosine has also been shown to result in stimulation of K +ATP channels, leading to hyperpolarization of smooth muscle [12] and to decrease the entry of calcium into vascular smooth muscle leading to vasodilation [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%